In recent years, Netflix has spent time, interest and investment in creating the collection true crime which has become an integral part of understanding the genre. It’s a journey through the worst of human nature and especially how the worst crimes usually have complex backgrounds. The result is a collection of stories that are striking in that they show the dark side of our culture. And also the way the genre explores man from the most unpredictable and cruel points of view.
The latest addition to the platform’s catalogue. What did Jennifer do?, also became an argument for the ambiguity of criminal confessions. In particular, those that directly concern how cruelty, violence and false testimony are understood. The film reveals the most gruesome details of a case that shocked Canada and became a shocking story for Netflix. Much more, by demonstrating that much of what was known about this event was obscured by doubles and third versions, one more alarming than the other.
We leave you three reasons to watch What did Jennifer do?If you are an amateur true crime. From his ability to tell a complex story in an orderly and reliable manner to his careful analysis of the legal tools that failed in relation to this event. This is a review of a production that has become a new obsession for fans of the genre. At the same time, an interesting look at moral good and evil, skillfully transferred to the field of documentary film.
A controversial story, well told
The Netflix documentary manages to explore the complex and strange world of lies, half-truths and perjuries until it brings some order.. Especially when he manages to tell the story of an impossible crime simply and directly.
To wit: Jennifer Pan was a young woman living with her family in Markham, Ontario, Canada when she was attacked by a group of assailants. In the midst of brutal circumstances, she was wounded, her mother was killed, and her father was left in a coma. According to Jennifer’s testimony, It all happened during a complicated robbery committed by three unknown black men.
But everything described above turned out to be a lie. Hours and weeks passed, and the victim’s first statement turned out to be full of contradictions. Especially when the police confirmed that almost everything Jennifer said was unprovable or straight forward. The Netflix production first organizes all the information and then dives into the most eerie questions. In particular, the reason why Jennifer Pan made up many of the details of the attack.
Explore Jennifer Pan’s Point of View
One of the most interesting moments What did Jennifer do?, is that it makes it possible to carefully analyze the statements of its protagonist. This is a way to compare her first testimony, in which she claimed to have been tied up and listening to her parents beg for her life, with the dark truth that was hidden in the middle of her statement. Gradually, the documentary allows us to analyze the path in which Jennifer Pan’s point of view was transformed from a tragic story into a means of covering up a frightening fact.
The production shows all the gaps in the testimony of the victim, who quickly became the accused. And much more to make it clear that everything he said before was lies or very serious distortions of the truth. The Jennifer Pan case that shocked and horrified Canada is more than just a murder. It is also a journey through a crime with horrific consequences due to its ruthlessness and vileness. What is shown in meticulous detail.
What did Jennifer do? organically comes to a conclusion. Jennifer actively participated in the murder of her parents due to her ambitions and the strained relationship she had with them. A discovery that shocked and scared Ontario. In particular, when Jennifer tried to justify her actions, blaming family demands as a trigger for resentment that cannot be contained.
“True Crime” Breaking Stereotypes
Unlike the good part true crime from Netflix, What did Jennifer do?, is more interested in exploring its protagonist’s dark personality than the violent act he committed. Therefore, his best moments are devoted to immersion in the network of lies, falsehood and violence that surrounded the accused while assisting in the murder of her mother.
With its sober, dark tone, but above all its attention to detail in presenting the psychological picture of a ruthless killer, this offering is ideal for those interested in true crime. But at the same time, everyone passionate about research psychiatric and forensic examination of murders, the culprit of which goes beyond the usual canons.
Source: Hiper Textual
