Elon Musk’s lawyers have come up with a new way to break the deal with Twitter. They recalled the statements of the former head of the security service of the social network, who accused Twitter of insufficient protection of user data. Indirectly, this is a violation of the terms of the agreement.
Bloomberg studied the documents presented by Elon Musk’s lawyers and reported on the billionaire’s new argument for rejecting the deal to buy Twitter.
Musk’s representatives refer to the statements of Pater Zatko, Twitter’s former head of security, who accused the social network of insufficient protection of user data.
Zatko, in particular, pointed to “obvious shortcomings” in Twitter’s work in protecting against hacker attacks, using outdated software, and hiding information about security rule violations from the social network’s leaders. .
All of these arguments can be used indirectly in court as an argument to break the deal between Elon Musk and Twitter, the agency notes.
The trial involving Peter Zatko is scheduled for October 17. More than 100 witnesses will participate in it.
Author:
Kirill Bilyk
Source: RB
I am Bret Jackson, a professional journalist and author for Gadget Onus, where I specialize in writing about the gaming industry. With over 6 years of experience in my field, I have built up an extensive portfolio that ranges from reviews to interviews with top figures within the industry. My work has been featured on various news sites, providing readers with insightful analysis regarding the current state of gaming culture.
