A artificial intelligence He can write a long book that makes sense. You can make illustrations with the style of any artist or illustrator. He can win chess games and cope with a robotic hand to control someone, even thousands of kilometers. However, This cannot describe the flower.
This is the conclusion of the study, fresh scientists from University of Ohio. He analyzes the ability Great language models To describe various typical words of our language. This is done, their descriptions are compared with such people.
Thus, it is observed that AI is very good, describing the concepts that have nothing to do with feelings or movement. However, when something comes from this, they have nothing to face The descriptive ability of a person. It is true that we are much better than AI who knows how to work in an open heart than the one who knows how to describe a flower. But if artificial intelligence does not interpret the world, how people can communicate correctly with us and that It may be a problemThe field is a sign that there are still many in large language models. Something as simple and complex as a description of the flower.
More than 4000 words for testing AI
To conduct this study, its authors collected the list 4442 wordsThis should have been described with large details both in the great model of the language and people. Then the descriptions made were dried on the basis of two standards. The first are Glasgow standards, which use nine parameters to measure the concept, among which are excitement, nesting and the throughput of the image. That is, it is analyzed whether the word “exciting and briefly described” was, at the same time checking the possibility of drawing or presenting it with this description.
On the other side Lancaster standards, This studies the information of this word from the sensory data.
The words used were in all types flower To swaypassing through something more abstract, as humorThe AI algorithms field were especially effective in describing Words without attitude to feelings or movement. However, when one of these two factors was involved, their assessments were very worse than those of people.
The main author of the study, psychologist QIHUI XUHe explains in the statement that AI cannot indicate the flower, because he does not know what his smell means, touch his petals or go through the meadow full of them. In fact, AI can only describe on the basis of Words or images. You can analyze in a few seconds more information than we could read for years. Therefore, the flower smells well or has a pleasant touch. But you cannot describe it correctly, because you did not feel it.
This is more useful than it seems
We have already seen that artificial intelligence should interpret the world, as we, so that we can communicate in the most effective way. Therefore, this type of research shows that in the future it will be necessary Invest in roboticsto solve their motor flaws, And in the sensors Able to provide sensory information.
If not, it does not matter that AI can read much more than we read in our life or that he can steal (in the end, what this is doing) the visual information of thousands of artists and illustrators. Until he could smell a bouquet of roses, try freshly prepared coffee or walk barefoot on the sand, we will continue victoryField
Source: Hiper Textual
