IN Civil War, North America has fallen. But not because of an attack by aliens, futuristic robots or a natural disaster. Alex Garland’s film takes a difficult step into dystopia and tells (the director also writes the script) how American democracy collapsed. Moreover, this destruction of the entire legal and political system presupposes armed confrontation between citizens. In particular, two territories of the country that have become enemies and are trying to become as they can and in the midst of a bloodbath with the central government.
For Alex Garland, the idea of armed confrontation between First World citizens is explored in a tense and harrowing atmosphere. Enough Civil War, explores the possibility that violence on a brutal scale is always closer than it seems. Moreover, even in countries with large resources and industrialization, an armed battle for control of energy sources and political symbols can become very close. Cause? Diversity of interests crossing the territory and radicalization of extreme political thought. The film addresses this point with brilliant performances and a clever – and dark – ending.
However, the director cleverly prevented his film from becoming a collection of political sermons, or at least a road map to disaster. We tell you three curiosities about Civil War this makes it perhaps one of the best films of the year. At the same time, he is one of the most brilliant at depicting violence and fear without necessarily falling into a preachy tone. Your best point of view.
It does not describe the event that marks the civil war.
Civil War describes a troubled time in the near future when American democracy has fallen due to internal pressure. But Alex Garland avoids giving too many details about what happened, and It explores much more of the brutality and brutality of the aftermath.
This is a reasonable decision. A film that reads more like an anti-violence message than a political analysis doesn’t need to present a fact and play the self-fulfilling prophecy game.
Instead, he suggests that it is all about a break with the central government over control of the country’s territory. Which leaves plenty of room for speculation about what might have happened without leaning towards any of them. But more importantly, it allows us to highlight the possibility that the current political stability is so fragile that anything could destroy it. The final, likely scenario Civil War, This is achieved by delving into the possibility of chaos to the cause that gave rise to it.
Does not take sides with any faction in power
Alex Garland’s script is a meticulous exploration of brutal circumstances on a grand scale. But rather than taking sides on any particular point of such a premise, he remains strictly neutral. Civil War This is not a battle between political ideologies, views on power or much less, are somewhere based on the picture.
Instead, the film convincingly argues that all violence is reprehensible and uncontrollable. A complex narrative path that becomes increasingly brutal and realistic as it shows what civil war can do to any country. Of course, it would be very easy to lean on one side. challenge or give meaning to any type of political speech.
Garland doesn’t do this, and it gives the story the feeling of moving through authentic terrain, where what happens in the middle of cities and highways matters more than the event that caused it. Civil War It’s a premise that delves into horror devastation caused by fratricidal confrontation, and this is what he adheres to.
Everything is told through journalists
The most curious thing is how intense the scenario Civil War, is his insistence on showing this through journalists. Alex Garland’s script cuts back on the involvement or appearance of politicians or any other figure of authority, leaving the narrative in the hands of the photographers. In particular, war photographers who analyze confrontations. and deaths because of their decision to openly show the seriousness of what was happening.
The result is a series of episodes that detail very specific situations, carefully analyzing everything related to the explosively disputed territory without taking sides. Which gives the film a strange point of view and, in particular, an honest look at about what might happen in such a situation.
Source: Hiper Textual
