The season of awards, with an Oscar of 2025 in the head, is an ideal opportunity to celebrate the best of the cinema and the world of entertainment. But also, as a rule, this is the time when the most unique and contradictory contradictions are revealed. Examples are not absent. Historical post of April rule in X (to Twitter) With the hashtag #OSCARSSSOWHITE, to the statements of Angelina Jolie in 2000 in the middle After -salesThe field is the truth that The history of a symbolic bonus is always a reason for discussion and surprise.
Nevertheless, Oscar 2025 will remember for sure for the quantity and variety of uncomfortable situations that he accumulated. The majority, which seemed to even challenge not only the norms of the Academy, but also the very existence of the prize. The debate about the use of artificial intelligence in various objects, disputes about sexual scenes on the screen. This, passing through the presence of various candidates on social networks. In this strange scenario, nothing is missing This seems more tense as the awards approach.
Despite all of the above, we leave you a collection of five most complex contradictions of Oscar 2025. The study of the complex land of public relations to ethical views, which leaves in its path a few weeks before the ceremony. But, in particular, an analysis of the extent to which the world of seventh art remains a great interest in understanding the modern pop culture. The most difficult lesson than various situations are left in their way.
Applications of Jacques of the audience
Emilia Perez This is one of the great events of the award season. With 13 nominations for the Oscar of 2025 at the Academy of Cinematographic Arts and Sciences, it has become an impenetrable film that accumulates more categories in the next ceremony. But this did not prevent him from becoming part of the great controversy that could be at risk. One of the most difficult, various statements by the director of the Audard Jacques. Especially for their attitude to Mexico, Mexicans and even the Spanish language.
The film was criticized for his confused plot. Located in Mexico, the argument tells the story of a drug dealer who decides to cross in search of his true personality as a woman. After that, this becomes the heroine of the cause of the disappearance in order to finally die. Everything, through a musical with complex choreographs and With the cast, which mainly Spanish does not speak smoothly.
Something, which made Jacques of the audience interrogate his idea of Mexican culture. This, given that his portrait of culture was superficial and stereotypical. In response, the French director admitted that he had much investigated on this issue, because he believed that he knew enough for what he wanted to express. His statements were more inconvenient in which he said that the Spanish language is “the language of modest countries, developing countries, poor and migrants.” The point of view that fed the debate in The nets around the film and again place it in the center of poor contradiction.
“Brutalist” and the use of artificial intelligence
The use of the technology of cutting edges was also part of the disputes during the season of the awards. In particular, the method in which artificial intelligence was used to improve the result of at least two prescribed productions. The most amazing case is a case Brutalistin which, according to editor David Yankso, Artificial intelligence was used to improve dialogs and some images.
On the one hand, production was used Respect (Software for editing the voice with AI) to make the Hungarian accent more realistic in their main characters. Thus, Edrien Brody and Felicity Jones were supposed to record dialogs for the training of the system. Something, which later allowed the application to improve its pronunciation at the points at which both failed. As Yankso admitted, The use of software was decided to accelerate the process of post -product.
On the other hand, generation was used for some images that are part of the last section of the film. Always, according to David Yankso, everything was associated with the ability of the tool to facilitate processes and even make them cheaper for production. The moment that emphasized when explaining the reason for the decision and why, He believed that it was a viable option for the future current film industry.
What do the Academy Rules say about the use of artificial intelligence?
At the moment, there is a specific rule in the midst of regulation of the Academy of Arts and Cinematic Sciences for Oscar 2025 on the use of generative artificial intelligence. Thus, the decision on this issue, and this may affect the possibilities Brutalist In the face of a reward, this will depend on the opinions of voters. Nevertheless, most of the world of entertainment continues to consider various software and relevant programs, as few ethical tools. The point of view that can be decisive in the future BrutalistField
Lack of proximity coordinators in “Anora”
Anora Sean Baker was a surprise in Oscar 2025. The story of a sex worker, which ends in the middle of a tragic novel with a member of the Russian mafia, is controversial as necessary. Especially because the argument is a significant amount Erotic scenes, in a particularly delicate era on this issue.
Thus, the statements of the protagonist Mickey Madison, recognizing that he did not use the coordinator of intimacy in the most complex sequences, which caused contradiction. During his conversation with Pamela Anderson in actors on actors DiversityThe actress admitted that she preferred to shoot with someone, except for her coastal brand Eidelstein. Difficult solution, in the middle of the era in That sexual sequences are usually under strict supervision.
The figure of the coordinator of intimacy is relatively recent, and its use began formally since 2010. But it was the importance of the #Metoo movement, which led to the fact that it was necessary during the filming of sexual scenes. In particular, in order to provide legal and emotional protection for both actors and actresses, as well as for research. Thus, Madison’s decision again opened awkward debate about the need to do this. Much more than it can mean that the appointed Oscar refuses the security guide on the set. Especially when there is no clear regulation about this.
Fernanda Torres “Black Face”
Oscar is nominated and the winner of The Golden Globe for the best female role for her performance in I’m still hereAlso crossed the land of disputes in recent weeks. This, after he became into the light, a comic sketch, in which they starred in 2008 and in which the face of black was drawn. An extremely insulting image that immediately caused a moderate scandal around the actress. Something, which made the translator apologize immediately and proposed a statement, accepting what happened Author: DeadlineField
Torres, who gained fame after the victory over Nicole Kidman and Angelina Jolie on the night of the delivery of the Golden Globe of 2024, was immediately described as one of the favorites in the award season. Something, which was more than obvious after the tape of Walter Sallace is removed in the Oscar list nominated for The best film. Thus, the scandal with the clip found Hollywood by surprise.
Nevertheless, the translator hastened to deepen what happened without fear of details about it. According to him, at that time, “awareness of racist history and symbols of a person drawn by black, have not yet entered the general public consciousness in Brazil.” So, at a distance, it believes that it is inexpressive And the complete lack of respect for both the country and the rest of the world.
Karl Sofia Gascon and social networks
However, perhaps the most incorrect and heavy scandal of all Oscar 2025, holds Karl Sofia Gascon as a center. Translator, Oscar, appointed to her performance in Emilia PerezHe ended up in the center of contradictions, as the tape became one of the obvious winners of the season. Online disposals with various users through X (previously Twitter), with difficult signs of production criticism. Actress pE found in the center of the storm of the media, which became more and more complicated.
The situation became more intense after reaching a place in the category of the best actress of the year in the Oscar of the Academy. On January 29, the interview became a viral in which Gakon said that the team of nominated Fernanda Torres was part of the media war against him. A point that released a contradiction in networks that even demanded this Diversity specified that the statements were not at risk His status of a reward of the novice Oscar.
But everything became more difficult on Thursday, January 30, when users X (to Twitter), discovered a group of post of the actress in the period from 2020 to 2021. Most controversial opinions about Muslims, the murder of George Floyd and even a variety of Oscar awards. This time, Diversity Compiled tweets In an article in which he investigated step -by -step contradictions.
On the same day, Karl Sofia Gascon apologized in a public statement: “I want to admit a conversation about my past publications about social networks that caused pain. Like someone in the marginal community, I know this suffering very well, and I deeply feel those to whom I caused pain. I fought for the best world. I think that the light will always defeat the darkness, ”he added in a statement. However, on January 31, he deactivated his account on the platform, In the midst of new conflicting results in your Temporary scale For a decade.
A rarity in the season of the awards that should be mentioned
Satira “Johanna Sakrel”
The success of Emilia Perez caused with him very tough debate about the Latin American representation and stereotypes in Hollywood after his success in the 2025 Oscar nominations. more effective and provocative.
The result was an increasingly difficult dispute, which ultimately became a distinctive feature of the tour on the film. In particular, when the cast and director Jacques Audard again and again insisted that this argument was not interested in being true. Before that, they wanted to be universal and challenge the audience.
Nevertheless, disputes became even worse as soon as the tape was released in Mexico. The discomfort, which ultimately led to a satirical short director, director of the creator of content Tiktok Camila Aurora. The production made through Goofundme is a response and protest against the tape Angard and immediately became a phenomenon on social networks.
But it was not just a local success. Review in Vanity fair Upon arrival from cinemas. The truth is that the tape has become a symbol of abandoning Emilia Peres, as well as another demonstration An important role of social networks in the award season. For history.
Source: Hiper Textual
