In 2017, the winner of the reality translator leaked to intelligence, which he mentioned that Russia could intervene in the 2016 US presidential election. This is a historical milestone in American intelligence and the concept of the concept of confidentiality in, unlike patriotic duty. Reality, Tina Satter, takes out this premise in the field Thriller Unknown, But also increases Dilemma of consciousness On all its edges.
The winner insisted on an extraordinary case, which was important that the truth came to the media in order to demonstrate to which the collective opinion could be erroneous and manipulated. However, and, despite her good intentions, the official ended in prison, which caused a debate about confidentiality and loyalty Within the framework of high government spheres and power relations.
The director, who also writes the script, accepts all of the above and turns it into an awkward tour. The plot is focused on its interest in the winner (performed by Sidney Suini) and how you should cope with the responsibility and responsibility of the secret. Thanks to the transcriptions of interrogations and various hearings at which the official participated, the tape talks about various scenarios in which the winner participated.
What is hidden behind the authorities
A story that, that is, on legal materials, shows to what extent what is happening in the highest government spheres, has gloomy experience. The image that manages to demonstrate almost immediately, raising the idea that the White House decides what information is published. Direct manipulation, although, although not quite surprising, It is dangerous enough to question the transparency of the entire process that the film considers.
The tape begins with ensuring the thorough context of the real event on which it is based. He devotes his first minutes to deepen the reason that led to the winner of reality. The tape combines fragments of real records with various dialogs that consider the entire national security operation to show that its central character, This is in the midst of a difficult situation to explain at first glance.
On the one hand, the winner did not experience the pressure of anyone or anything – or that is why he insists – to filter the media into a very subtle intelligence report. So his absolute loyalty and fidelity North American ideals about honesty, truth and altruism.
But, of course, there is nothing so simple or diaphanum. Reality This is cynical and difficult, showing that the US government may contradict itself to reinforce their security. Thus, the conscientious objections of the winner seem fragile or even innocent compared.
Ethics and morality goes to court
Thus, he is more and more immersed in the concept that power decisions are never clean. Or at best, which are always aimed at protecting the common good, although in principle they seem diverging with ethics. This He offers Sidney Swini the opportunity to explore a complex character full of nuances.
Most of the interest in the plot Reality It is in the ability of the actress that this is her mysterious character. In addition to the patriotic features that can be attributed, the winner is a woman with her own point of view that it is fair, not.
Thus, his character leaves the heroin or villain to be a character of the one who plays with his own agenda of the day. In the end, one of the reasons that prompted the official to commit what was considered the betrayal of his homeland is his antipathy against Donald Trump.
Anti -system struggle for the struggle for truth
In addition to showing the test details that marked the precedent and history of North America, the plot Reality He is more focused on the nature of ethics and does it in the middle of political chaos, who left Donald Trump in his way. Thus, the focus of the script tries not to be too obvious in his complaint. That is, But from a different point of view.
And this should question the reason why someone risks his future in order to be an ideal, even his life in order to demonstrate to what extent the system, which is trying to encounter, is damaged. Reality He does not always show this difficult point of view And, at its end, he loses the impulse of the first measures.
But, despite everything, this is quite qualified to maintain stress. The position that he leaves is to show that for the authorities the truth is nothing more than a way of influencing what is happening around him. Thus, the last word will always be reserved when they show this truth. In the end, the tape only puts the basics for the viewer to decide.
Source: Hiper Textual
