5 directors of films without a bad movie (according to criticism)

The first film shot by Martin Scorsese was Who knocks on my door?In 1967, it was considered almost immediately as an adult work. This, although a very young candidate for the director was only 25 years old, and the camera has a little experience. But his way to deepen complex characters in the midst of a simple appearance is surprised. To do this, he transformed the premise of the script – he also wrote – in a moral study of an Italian American who must decide his future. The critical moment that will push the world of crime is almost unintentional.

To become the director’s debut work, the film was considered an example of intellectual social tension management. Also cultural context and spiritual pain. In addition, Martin Skorsze showed some of the problems that henceforth his observance: from corruption of institutions to Catholic guilt. The protagonist played by Harvey Keitel collided with street cruelty. In addition, to the corrupt legal system, which borders on the impossible decision. Released in Chicago International Film Festival In November 1967, critic Roger Ebert called her “genuine and powerful” work. At the same time, insisting on the fact that, without a doubt, the name Scorsese is often heard in the future.

For 58 years of career, Martin Scorsese not only performed the forecast of a famous critic. In addition, he has a curious honor to have an impeccable filmography in which each film is considered the jewelry of the film. But, despite the curiosity in his business, he is not the only one. We tell you about five directors without a bad film (in accordance with criticism). From the icon of Japanese cinema to a free thinker, which combines science and art. Everything in order to explore the cinema in the world in its most fruitful and higher quality dimension.

Akira Kurosava

As you can see in the aggregator Rotten tomatoesThe famous Japanese director never shot a film that is not considered a work of criticism. Thus, the qualifications of their cassettes in the order of 100 % positive criticism. The least preferable to the results of the results? Rapsodia in August 1991, which, despite the fact that it is not very appreciated According to the press specialized in the cinema, he received a modest 60 % favorable opinions.

But in addition to his work, known in the West, since its debut in 1943 with Sanshiro SugataThe director was considered one of the most promising in Asia. Especially for their ability to mix in the same scenarios, the nuances of Japanese culture, with a thorough analysis of universal feelings. Something, which ensured the work – later – its ability to be out of time. Both, Attractive to any public on the planet, despite its purely Japanese topic.

One of the most interesting attributes of the long director of the director is his sequence. Within 30 films, Akira Kurosava studied human nature, a sense of fidelity, the power of love, and even about the wounds of the post -war period in her country. Throughout the fabulous production, which surprised both critics as a pious audience, which accompanied it throughout its career. One of the advantages that make Be part of the list of directors who do not have a single bad film in their history of cinema.

Céline Sciamma

The French director also has a special privilege that critics consider all their high -quality filmography. IN Rotten tomatoes, None of his films, qualified presses, and specialized media are approved by 80 %. Something, which has become more obvious with the premiere Portrait of a woman in fire (2019), His most famous work and the one that brought him international recognition.

But, even in this case, success and popularity around his work are not his element of greater interest. In 2007, the director of the prime minister took place Water liliesAn intimate story that surprised criticism and fascinated the audience. A story that follows two teenagers in complete sexual awakening, touched on issues such as consent and pain of refusal, with subtlety and elegance. Something, which brought him a cautious reception in his native France and To be recognized by one of the most promising filmmakers of the country’s guild.

On the other hand, in 2011 the director was surprised Fingeringwho received almost unanimous aclamication on both sides of the ocean. The plot that focuses on a girl who questions her gender identity has demonstrated the ability of Sciamma to solve complex topics without losing subtlety. The fact that there is more than a well -deserved place in this list of directors without a bad film.

Paul Thomas Anderson

It is designed to become one of the main directors of modern cinema, he also has a filmography full of jewelry that blinded criticism. From his brilliant debut with Hard eight (Sydney) In 1996, all cinematic work of the director was successful after another. Especially thanks to his ability to reflect on good and evil in our time, Dark and even moves in its various ribbons.

Something, which allowed him, very soon, to demonstrate his infallible instinct for dark stories with the background of simple mankind. From Boogie Nights Next year his debut, which studied the world of adult cinema Magnolia 1999, in which he gave this Cruz one of the great roles of his career. The truth is that Anderson managed to create A complex, strange and always provocative style that has fixed its place in the cinematic world.

But that would be Wells of ambitions 2007, which will celebrate before and after his career. It is considered to them New York Times As one of the great films of the 21st century and criticism as a work of cinematic art, the director’s talent completely showed. In addition, his ability to tell a great history of greed, from imperfect and spoiled characters. Achievement that makes him one of the great directors About our time, without a bad film, to regret it.

Robert Eggers

The director, fascinated by dark and ominous, has four films considered by art for criticism. So much so that all of them exceed 85 % of positive reviews in the aggregate of rotten tomatoes. The truth is that Robert Eggers showed that his obsession with details and historical severity pays his fruit. Witch Since 2016, he blinded both cinema fans and a historical drama. This, thanks to the combination of an almost fine visual section, With a complex and deep plot, on supernatural evil.

For Lighthouse (2019), in the main roles of Robert Pattinson and Willem Dapho, drew inspiration from German expressionism to create a mythological nightmare of horror. This time in a black -white tape has become an accurate study of the use of light, frames and amazing cinematography. All the characteristics that were repeated in Northern manHistorical rethinking About the legend of Prince Amlet and his fall in a disaster.

However, it was Nosferata (2024), the work that demonstrated his ambitions and strengthened his style. The re -extraction of classics with the same name in 1922, the tape used color and the situation to explore the Gothic historical classics. Until now, this is his most famous work, and, without a doubt, the one that gave him a place on this list.

Christopher Nolan

Christopher Nolan debuted with Next In 1998, he surprised criticism for the management of psychological tension. But that would be Crazy (2000), a film that showed its ability to risk and cinematic experiments. Especially having a story with a reverse chronology that was generous Small and struggled to turn to the insight of the audience to open a riddle.

The next was a long and fruitful filmography, full of success and all that, with approved in Rotten tomatoesThe field only Dogma He has 69%, and although his most difficult film is still being considered, he is still a milestone in the perception of time and reality. A wide collection of various and all quality tapes, which makes it In one of the directors who do not have a bad film, to their honor.