Interior Minister Daniel Palacios, He just met a trill from Gustavo Bolivar, senator of the Historical Pact.

(We invite you to read: Anne from Miniinterior refuses to be notarized and is looking for a paid millionaire)

Referring to an investigation by EL TIEMPO into the compensation claimed by the Minister’s mother, Piedad Rocío Martínez, Bolivar called it disgusting.

Since last year, EL TIEMPO has filed a lawsuit. lawyer Martínez seeks compensation for his rights being violated in a 2006 notary competition, He aspired to be appointed to a notary public post in Bogota.

(This may interest you: Powerful ex-officials in reports on the alleged looting of peace silver)

To settle the case, Martínez’s lawyer submitted a settlement proposal. waived the compensation to be paid to him in exchange for the appointment of a certain notary public: 24.

However, the Notaries Inspectorate has been informed these days that Martínez has withdrawn from this agreement, which was approved by the conciliation committee of the said Inspectorate. In fact, the compromise will be final for this entity.

After the trill of Bolivar, who added a link to the EL TIEMPO article, Minister Palacios replied: “My mother, because she is my mother, the case filed in 2008 is a Colombian with access to justice. ruled by justice in his favour; A process of more than 14 years. Of course, justice applies to you only when it suits your mind!” replied Minister Palacios.

(See all the stories of EL TIEMPO’s Investigation Unit here)

And he added: “You’re used to being bullied on the nets, you don’t care about the facts. But My father is a notary for winning a merit competition with over 14,000 Colombians.. His resume and career speaks for itself, I was in college when I competed, find out”.

EL TIEMPO contacted Piedad Martínez’s lawyer to find out about his arguments. however, he stated that he did not speak to journalists during the trial.to do.

(Also: Why did 9,822 members leave the Police in 19 months?)

However, Martínez’s defense team later turned up their legal arguments and failures protecting it

1.- In October 2008, he filed a lawsuit against Millet at the Cundinamarca Administrative Court. Action for cancellation and restitution of rights. Filed 25000232500020080094303

2.- On 30 August 2018, The Court condemned the Nationto appoint him as a notary public and pay some money as compensation.

3.- Dr. Three times, Martínez demanded partial compliance with the notarization and waiver of the economic penalty to which he had a legitimate right. The Supernotariado did not agree and demanded that the sentence be discussed at the Council of State.

4.- On 2 August 2021, the Council of State approved the Court’s decision.

5.- On September 10, 2021, upon the defendant’s request, the formula for complying with the same penalty is jointly submitted to the Council of State for approval, although the resources rejected by the Council of State and the Forensic Defense Institution have been submitted. or repeatedly rejected.

6.- On June 23, 2022, the Council of State did not decide on the joint petition and decided to certify the copies so that the defendant’s lawyer could be investigated for delaying the case by making groundless objections. However, he files a new appeal that has not yet been resolved.

7.- Dr. Martínez, by a decision in his favour, is to restore his name and therefore insists that his will is to resolve this dispute in the simplest way possible by limiting compliance alone, without incurring any cost to the public treasury. his appointment as a notary, setting aside the recognized economic claim, but carried out by the first positions of the Supernotariado and later State Judicial Defense Agencyallowed it to be extended over time and prevented it from happening, therefore, although the content of the sentence could not be changed, it was decided to wait for the resolution of the appeal, as he expressed it.

8.- The process, which has been going on for 14 years, continues to cause harm, including the attempt to include the current Interior Minister, Daniel Palacios, as a result of judicial decisions. set chronologically, nothing to see

9.- Thus, the decision of the Council of State, Dr. Martinez violated and the failure of the Nation’s action to be regulated by law demonstrates to the defendant that these rights must be restored, as they would to any other person.

RESEARCH UNIT
[email protected]
@UinvestigativaET
Follow us now on Facebook

Source: Exame

Previous articleBrown dwarfs have sand clouds
Next articleDo Brazilians have a place for Pinterest in their hearts?
I am Bret Jackson, a professional journalist and author for Gadget Onus, where I specialize in writing about the gaming industry. With over 6 years of experience in my field, I have built up an extensive portfolio that ranges from reviews to interviews with top figures within the industry. My work has been featured on various news sites, providing readers with insightful analysis regarding the current state of gaming culture.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here