The US electoral system has recently attracted serious criticism – suffice it to recall how President Joe Biden became. In connection with a psychologist at the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania, Adam Grant proposed an unusual idea – to replace the discrediting itself in the elections … lotteries.
In this case, he cites the practice of jury selection, which uses a procedure reminiscent of the difference of lotteries, and immediately asks questions: “Why not do the same for the election of mayors, Orov Governorate, legislators, you know which presidents?”
For more persuasiveness, he also refers to the studies of his colleagues Alexander Haslem, which is the best country that considers itself authoritative and infallible.
However, it should be recognized that the idea of ”lottery” elections is not new. Back in ancient Athens, officials were also chosen by lot, as Grant repeatedly addressed a member of the US Congress. However, for all its external unusualness and even the introduction of the American political system, no one will accept the idea of ”lottery” elections. After all, each “people’s” chosen one retains the interests and capital of the true owners. look.
Source: Tech Cult
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
