On the test bench, we have a Ryzen 7 7800X3D/7700 processor, an RTX 3080 Ti Palit GameRock graphics card, a B650M Aorus Pro AX motherboard, and, quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4.
In Cyberpunk 2077, even at 720p and DLSS, the difference between the 7700 and 7800X3D was 22% (in favor of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D): 135 fps and 165 fps, respectively.
NFS Unbound was running on ultra settings. The difference was around 22%.
Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales launched with a very high preset and RT enabled. The 7800X3D only had an 8% advantage. That’s just over 150fps on average.
In Call of Duty WarZone at 720p with maximum DLSS and minimum graphics the difference was 12%.
Ghost of Tsushima was tested at maximum settings with minimum resolution. It turned out that the 7800X3D processor was 23% faster than the 7700.
The difference between processors in Hogwarts Legacy was 12%, in Far Cry it was 6 – 16%, and in The Last of Us it was 16%. Episode 1 – 7%.
At the same time, in A Total War Saga the processors showed the same performance, in Rust the difference was 50%, in Escape From Tarkov – 18%, in CS 2 – 16%.
If you do not have an RTX 4090 but have a lower-end processor, then the Ryzen 7 7700 processor would be a more rational choice. This also applies, of course, to more modern and demanding games.
On average, the difference between 7800X3D and 7700 was 20%, but there were exceptions. For example, in Rust, this ratio is 50%. But is it worth it when you pay more than 10 thousand rubles? If your priority is not gaming, but work tasks, then 7700 can also be preferred.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
