Smartphones are best distributed to the worst of the quality of the video.
Samsung S25 Ultra. Even when shooting against the light, the front camera gives a good result. Portrait video can be saved as 4K 30 f/s with HDR like iPhone. With the support of 8K, the quality of the super cole is also pleasant to quality. Pro-Mode is available both in the main block of the cameras and on the facade line. One of Samsung’s powerful aspects is the best sound recording on the market. The double record here is better than the rest of the flagships. The video is strong with the possibility of approaching even 8K. At night, the rest of the smartphones in an election, such as ultrashik and front line is applied badly. In this way, they do not have time schedules, all filters can only be used in 1080 rubles, when moving Sloumo weak stabilization and defect.
iPhone 16 Pro Max. The front camera takes a video with good stabilization, knows how to save a portrait video at 4K 30 f/s, and you can directly add HDR in the film effect. The main block of the camera is also satisfied with the quality of the video. When opening the improved stabilization regime, the picture is kept very equal even with a strong tremor. Focusing on sound quality and good stabilization and movement, 4K 120 k/s Sloumo is pleasant. At night, the main lens works quite. Cons: Lack of light, the front camera and super Çelgi do not work hard, weak video, time tours are limited to full HD, you need to open HDR in settings, there is no 8k video.
Vivo X200 Pro, X200 Ultra, X100 Ultra. These three flagships are very similar in terms of video adjustment. The X200 Ultra has a wider viewing angle, 8K and SlouMo’s support for 4K 120 f/s. The dynamic range is wider than the X200 Pro. The main plus of all these models is a strong 200 MP TV. Another of the powerful sides is to shoot the timeline. The x200 ultra is particularly good in night shooting (the super chain is particularly pleasant). All three smartphones also have Pro-MOD, excellent portrait video, high quality logarithm, confident stabilization. One of the main disadvantages of all listed models is that weak stabilization in the front room cannot put black magic application, no support for double video recording. The main problem of the X100 Ultra is color -creating color, the front camera is also very weak compared to other vivos. The problem is the Vivo X200 Ultra on the main camera: this lens is constantly sparkling and too much. It can be saved in 8k as 1x only like x100 ultra. The main module has a 35 mm focal length in the X200 Ultra, which is very uncomfortable. At night, the X200 ultra front camera showed itself weaker than the X200 Pro.
Xiaomi 15 Ultra. The front line has good details, and the portrait video looks valuable. The main block of the cameras here is 8K in all lenses. Super hair is also pleasant: a big imaging angle, good stabilization, quality is on top. The portrait video also looks valuable. Log and HDR video can be saved to any of the lenses and will be pleasant in colors and high quality. 1920 FPS has slow removal. However, with a lack of light, all modules of the video withdrawal are not weak. Even the night regime saves the situation. The color of the smartphone is also controversial. The video in 8K is normally recorded only in a static position, but is not recorded on movement. Slow removal while moving is accompanied by ofocus and weak stabilization.
Sony Xperia 1 VI. One of the main advantages of this smartphone is the ability to connect creative view filters and configure the color correction of 4K 60 f/s and even 120 f/s. In terms of attraction quality and color creation, all cameras are good. There is also a very cool pro-mod. Portrait mode is only available in full HD, but it gives a very good video for the results. The most important disadvantage of this device is the sound recording quality. There is also weak stabilization in the front and main rooms, the device does not remove the device in these modules at night, there is no timing and zoom is affordable. The smartphone has no logarithmic video and 8K support.
Oppo X8 Find Ultra. In general, he is very pleased. In the afternoon of the façade, it is well removed from it, has three focus lengths, the main lens pleases both the quality and stabilization. A good result is obtained in the main module and darkness. Pro-Video has a shooting function, a good smartphone records sound and sound. Morovideo is particularly impressive, although there is no special regime. However, the front camera has a very narrow dynamic range, ie the HDR mode does not work for it, it is weak for stabilization, the super fence has problems when shooting in bright light (the pieces disappear, the glare creeps), when shooting during the running. The front module and super chain work weak at night, but there is no 8K mode.
Onur Magic 7 Pro. When shooting on the front camera, you will get confident stabilization, a good dynamic range. Super -haiD has a great imaging angle in the main lens, even in complex scenes. The main feature of the main camera here is a floating diaphragm where you can achieve a real optical blur of the background. Sound is also obtained in Magic 7 Pro. Although it is slightly limited compared to competitors, there is a pro-model that works quite. At the same time, the details of HDR and portrait video on the facade line, the main camera and frontal color, the details are not very good when shooting on a selfie camera. Stabilization in main modules is not always good for a smartphone. Videos are only 10x and quality mediocre, mounted under the super -chain camera block, the camera application interface is wrong, no support for 8K.
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL. The front camera of this smartphone has a good dynamic range and confident stabilization. Super -haired is pleased with a great perspective. However, when purchasing this model, some of the functions will not work because it is promised to add only. The main disadvantage of the device is intact: the smartphone saves mediocre, captures all foreign sounds and wind. The quality of the video from the front camera, like HDR mode, is usually weak. It also does not support the portrait mode of the video of the video. At night, only the main camera gives more or less acceptable results. Also, the smartphone has no gift and mode to fix the video, there is no pro mode.
OnePlus 13. During daytime shooting on the front camera, the picture is fixed and quite high quality. In addition, the main camera has support for 8K video recording. Another powerful side of this smartphone was a solid record. At night, in frontal video, the video turns out to be realistic, but weak in quality. The same applies to super -shit in the dark. Bad apparatus and stabilization during operation. In sunny weather, the glare is noticed in the video. Samsung S25 Ultra loses the video almost always, but there is no log-video.
Huawei Pura 70 Ultra. The front camera has three focus lengths: a wide angle, 0.8x and 1x. You can also save a video at 4K 60 f/s. In the afternoon, the smartphone shows good results: the clarity and quality of the image is about smooth and stability. One of the chips of the device is a floating diaphragm with 1.6 to 4.0 value of the main camera. From minus: The main module has weak stabilization even in the afternoon, it is impossible to make a video at night, it is impossible to make a video, super whisk can stop working for no reason, the portrait video is available in only 1080R and is weak in quality.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
