From December 2023 to December 2024, the AAAS team chose 64 scientific works and asked Chatgpt to make short investigations. Different promotions were used for verification and the texts were compared with the materials prepared by professional journalists.
The result was weak. Although Chatgpt knew how to copy the structure of such notes, the narrative often simplified or distorted the facts, confused the causes and the investigation, forgot the important details, and sometimes “inflated”.
Journalists’ predictions were also low: about 2 points out of 5 out of 5 for the accuracy and interesting of the text. Only one re -expression received the maximum score.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
