There is no evidence that the studies carried out under the measure were carried out inappropriately or unsafely. It was also approved by an internal biosafety review committee and the Boston Public Health Commission, the university where the study was conducted, but it turns out that the research team did not coordinate their work with the US National Allergy Institute. and Communicable Diseases, one of its sponsor projects. They said they would seek an answer to the question of why scientists learned about their work from the media in the first place.

In their progress report, the team of scientists did not make it clear that they were conducting experiments that could relate to the amplification of the pathogen.

Earlier, scientists at Boston University talked about their work in creating a hybrid virus in which the spike protein of the micron version of SARS-2 is fused with the Wuhan strain virus, the original version that emerged in China in 2020. Tests showed that the new strain was more lethal to one strain of lab rat than the omycrone strain, killing 80% of infected mice.

More importantly, the original strain killed 100% of the mice on which it was tested. The university denied claims by some media outlets that a more dangerous virus was created during the study.

News cannot be equated with a doctor’s prescription. Consult an expert before making a decision.

Source: Ferra

Previous article‘I’m a scientist myself’: how do plants measure manganese levels in soil?
Next articleHow do games work if you connect a video card via a USB connector?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here