Materialists This is a romantic comedy that plays with the paths of the genre. But also this reflection, and sometimes heavy and even cruel, about love in our time. To achieve this, the second atmosphere of Selin Song in Manhattan. What to make the city with a script in which feelings are as agreed as square meters PenthouseField Comparison that the tape will use more than once.
Then the script is focused on Lucy (Dakota Johnson) a loving consultant with a sharp sense of humor and a cynical optics about the novel. His story is confused with the history of John (Chris Evans), a bohemian actor who comes in a fewer, and Harry (Pedro Pascal), a banker with more charisma than ethics. Love triangle, which It exposes not only their hearts, but also his personal tables.
Lucy is a professional in the art of searching for a partner. The element that the script explores at the beginning, with its most frivolous angle. Therefore, at first the plot shows it as qualified negotiations on virtues and the shortcomings of its customers. Step by step, the character makes it clear that the argument is more connected with the business of love and meetings than a traditional romantic turn. The solution that allows the argument to move from simple laughter – the film is really funny – to moving moments.
Materialists
Materialists are a romantic comedy that uses the usual turns of the genre to explore in modern love. Thus, he goes from ambitions to an idyllic novel, through the complex world of applications for appointment. But Song Selin decides to deepen his story from unusual corners. What gives Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans the opportunity to give difficulty to his characters.
Romantic comedy, which is actually something else
Seeline Song is not satisfied with the reproduction of a conventional formula in the genre. Instead of monitoring the shadow of ribbons as You have e -mail (1998) or Hill grid (1999), select sabotage the bubble. If in the nineties the magic of love flourished between libraries and emails, here it arises between the applications of luxurious acquaintances and a conversation after valuable with the accountant. What seems to be a romantic comedy unfolds like an essay, disguised as a glamorous story. So think about the intersection Between capital and affection, about whether the love can be permitted or can be simply paid.
From this label Romcom This is not enough to determine MaterialistsThe director and screenwriter create a plot that plays with classic paths – an unresolved main character, two grooms with opposite attributes, the city as a third character – but takes their sugar and wears them with irony. Much more, this allows the argument to reproduce unusual glasses in similar stories. Thus, the film shows a love failure, disappointment and even hopelessness. What, With the same difficulty as this, to show that, despite everything, love can survive.
Lucy works on DecorateE, a company that is engaged in business in search of a couple in a corporate form. In particular, this is guaranteed that a related soul meets such cold criteria as an Excel sheet: growth, heritage, attractiveness, career. What’s in the saga Bridget Jones It was delightfully randomly randomly, polished and calibrated here. Worship This is not TinderBut it acts as an exclusive boutique of romance. But this slides less in search of a match and much more, an interview with candles. This universe shines because it is absurd, and However, this is strangely recognizable.
Tribute to the floor in “Materialists”
However, Song Selin does not fall into a light cartoon. Links to the Universe Jane Austin and Edith Warton are not everyday. Like the authors, the director understands that love is due to social structures, as well as personal illusions. Lucy is not a traditional romantic hero. His work allows him to testify a neat romance. In addition, it shows it as a victim of its logic. His salary is modest, his sharp judgment and his own sentimental decisions, the reflection of the contradictions that he preaches. In this game, the heart does not always win.
Dakota Johnson provides a unique combination between corrosion humor and realistic vulnerability for Lucy. What makes his character much more than three -dimensional than others Romcom recent. Chris Evans, who often worked on the autopilot, finds a more interesting vein here: A good person, but without glamor, without good luck and without a compass.
Pedro Pascal, on the other hand, plays his character, as if he was James Bond Upper East East Side: charming, rich and wishing to commit. However, the interpreter reaches this, meanwhile, the trap becomes obvious. Despite his attractiveness, the character becomes gradually cruel. It is exciting how the director Do not glorify him and do not condemn it: he examines him, exposes and leaves the viewer.
End of time for “materialists”
Materialists This does not offer easy or end with fireworks. There is no a balloon or kiss under the snow. On the other hand, what remains is an uncomfortable question of whether modern love can be selfless. The film does not judge Lucy for her ambition or her lovers for her check books: she simply shows how seduction was stolen by the logic of the market. Love is no longer what happened before. Or maybe it has never been.
The climax of history is not based on a great revelation, but on the accumulation of small gestures, views and honest confessions. The classic structure of the “choice of one” is undermined when you understand that the choice does not guarantee a happy result. Who wants stability if it goes with boredom? Who chooses passion if it is unreliable? The script does not give answers; Offer questions.
Therefore, he masks himself as an elegant comedy, but contains a modern tragedy inside. His main virtue lies in how he manages to maintain a balance between the visual show – clothes, departments, ideal gestures – and emotional nudity that underlies this facade.A great film for romance, which is actually wrong.
Source: Hiper Textual
