Titan: The tragedy of the OceangeiteThe last one True crime From Netflix it is not easy to see. Especially because he manages to unite in the same scenarios several views on one of the most conflicting catastrophes of the decade. On the one hand, this shows all the erroneous decisions that forced to immerse Titan in the end, killing their inhabitants. To another extreme, a way that is a small compassionate and even violent reaction, He turned the debate into a bad prospect of privileges and luxury.
Between both documentaries, Monroe Monroe is asked about how such a tragedy became a milestone regarding the discussion about marine safety. The explosion that levied five lives at the bottom of the North Atlantic was not just a technological disaster. In addition, this was a manifestation of corporate arrogance, which used the alleged innovation to hide the irresponsibility of its investors. So, two years after the disaster of the submersible titan of the echo of this tragedy, it still does not resonate from its heroism – because it was not – ,, But for the reckless pride of his architect, Stocton Rush.
The Netflix documentary examines facts with gloomy air, but without sweeteners or ransom. Unlike Salvation (2021). Titan: The tragedy of the Oceangeite He does not have enough inspirational climax. There are no heroes, only poorly made decisions. Stocton Rush, the self -proclaimed pioneer of the Abyisal Exploration, was also his main victim, although not in the most noble sense. His death, along with the death of four other passengers, not only symbolizes the technical failure of an incredible ship, but also the collapse of a business vision that ignored fundamental warnings. The anxiety was there, only that the businessman decided to ignore them.
The sequence of errors that led to the tragedy
One of the most alarming elements in the documentary is a clear, almost immediately clarifying the frightening idea. The alarming thing is not that loading failed; The alarming thing is that this failure seemed inevitable. Stocton Rush has already expressed contempt for traditional regulatory systems, guaranteeing that they prevent innovations with their “unnecessary” safety requirements. This vision led him to external control, even evading minimal standards in international waters.
In style Gryzli man (2005) Werner Herzog, the documentary shows Stocton Rush as a person seduced by his own reflection: charismatic, safe for cameras, but is disconnected from real risk. Being a fan of bears, who ultimately devoured them, Rush, as he believed, dominated the environment that surpassed him. Clips that show this They do not suggest a madman, but someone convinced their intellectual superiority.
Some describe this as a misinterpreted genius; Others, such as Megaloman with a technological complex of martyrs. Dangerous mixture. Former co -authors, such as Bonnie Karl, remember him less as a far -sighted leader, but rather as a imitator of business titans, envious of musk or Bezos, but with a smaller number of substance. The documentary collects these votes, Basically, criticism, which restores the ignored chain of warning.
Backstropa background, which can be avoided
OceangateFirst, this attracted respectable technical talent. But the internal corporate culture soon became toxic. Those who raised their hand to indicate defects in the design of the titanium were considered by sabotists. David Lokridge, a former director for marine operations, appears as one of the few with sufficient professional integrity to encounter Rush. Price? He was fired, and then demanded In a frightening attempt, which speaks more about power than in fact.
In this sense, the documentary remembers the documentary Fyre: the greatest party that has never beenThe Fyre festival chronicle, where another seer pushed his team to a disaster for vanity. In both cases, which shine on the outside of the complex network of administrative problems, which in the case Oceangate They turned out to be mortals. The most contradictory solutions of Stocton Rush – use carbon fiber in an environment where only the titanium showed resistance – They are described with details to demonstrate their responsibility in the tragedy.
Microphones installed in immerse found a crunch of structures under pressure, ominous signals that were systematically ignored. Instead of doubling security guarantee efforts, Oceangate He replaced experts with fresh unhealthy graduates. The logic seemed to be: if there is no one who asks questions, there is no problem. Very expensive world.
A tour of the disaster to Titan: Ocean Tragedy
The most terrible scene in the documentary is not visual, but auditory. The sound of carbon fibers breaks, as if the titanium had become an exploded pressure cooker. At that time, the viewer becomes an involuntary listener of the reverse reference without return. In a documentary, it is possible to capture this feeling of inevitable condemnation, as if the disaster had already occurred From the moment of conception of the project.
Rash starred in previous incidents, such as almost clogging in Andrea DoriaAnother warning that did not change his course. Pissility has become a domestic policy. Instead of working under national flags, Oceangate He chose the spread of international waters. There is no flag, without rules. This type of bureaucratic escape allowed the company not only to violate all types of security agreements. In addition, earning money thanks to a system whose security has never been checked at all. Dot What Titan: The tragedy of the Oceangeite This is distinguished as one of the main causes of the tragedy.
Thus, the risk of a very serious accident took advantage of the cracks of the system. The saddest thing is that no one could stop Stoctona. He had money, influence and an attractive story. His vision has already blinded media -investors. But under this rhetoric, brutal contempt for the fragility of a person was hidden. The cooling prospect, which, in addition to scoring it, turned the immersed titanium into a painful symbol of irresponsibility and inefficiency.The most incorrect moment that the documentary leaves on its way.
Source: Hiper Textual
