Campaign Call Of Duty Modern Warfare 3 evokes mixed feelings among fans. Apart from some flashes of nostalgia, the main story of the new installment is far from captivating audiences. But it would also reveal controversial developments at Sledgehammer Games.

Reportedly Bloombergmain part Modern Warfare 3 It was developed in less than a year and a half. If true, it would mean that the team in charge of the new Call of Duty This took less than half the time normally taken to deliver similar specifications.

Specifically, campaign Modern Warfare 3 This would be completed in just 16 months.says Jason Schreier. A well-known journalist claims to have spoken with several employees in charge of the game. They would express their irritation and disappointment with the conditions in which they were forced to work.

Time window to prepare Call Of Duty Modern Warfare 3 would be so small that developers would have to work hard all nights and weekends comply with the director’s requirements. An image that seems to revive the most anachronistic vices of Activision, which has been involved in several controversies in the past due to similar situations.

Campaign Modern Warfare 3 it would have been developed in just 16 months

Makarov, antagonist of the Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 campaign.

Campaign Modern Warfare 3 He is already considered one of the worst in history Call of Duty. Its short length of about 3 hours and poor execution of the plot, which in itself is not great, caused a lot of discomfort among fans. Mainly among those who had early access to the game.

It’s true that Multiplayer is where the real interest of this part lies., and there seem to be no unpleasant surprises there. However, the main story that Sledgehammer Games offered today is disapproving of its most loyal followers COD and questions the decision to take the saga from Infinity Ward.

However, why development Modern Warfare 3 would he have been shot down like that? Everything points to poor management of the project from its inception. It’s no secret that this part was actually supposed to be DLC for Modern Warfare 2 2022 However, in the middle of the project, it was decided to change the strategy and launch it as a full-fledged game.

Activision denies that this was the case and insists that its intention was always to launch Modern Warfare 3 as a title bonus. However, Sledgehammer Games takes a different position. Schreier’s sources claim that in the early months of development, there was uncertainty about the final format of the game (whether an expansion or a full version), and that many employees were told that it would be DLC.

However, Bobby Kotick’s people took the stage not only to change the type of launch, but also the history of the campaign. Given limited time and expectations far beyond the initial ones, the studio would do everything in its power to offer the best it could, but without much success. The results were visible.

Source: Hiper Textual

Previous articleeBook Offers on Amazon Esquenta Black Friday: 50+ books starting from R$ 0.40
Next articleSingapore fintech startup with Russian roots Osome laid off part of its team
I am Bret Jackson, a professional journalist and author for Gadget Onus, where I specialize in writing about the gaming industry. With over 6 years of experience in my field, I have built up an extensive portfolio that ranges from reviews to interviews with top figures within the industry. My work has been featured on various news sites, providing readers with insightful analysis regarding the current state of gaming culture.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here