In two documents sent to different offices, lawyer General de la Nación filed a criminal complaint against him and filed a disciplinary complaint. Lilyan Johana Bastidas Huertascoordinating judge of Paloquemao who authorized the release of two people peace spokesmen.
posted resources, Investigation and National Judicial Disciplinary Commissionabout the fact that after the government recommended it as spokesperson, the official would not have the authority to issue the tickets that enabled Santiago Márquez and Adriana Bermeo to gain their freedom.
(You can read: “There is no irregularity”: they respond to criticism of the freedom of peace spokespersons)
These legal resources had already been evaluated by the attorney general, daisy hairHe warned earlier this week that the coordinator could leave his post by: do not post procedure Do not take into account the releases to guarantee the controlling judges, nor the Public Ministry officials to guarantee the process.
The complaint filed by lawyer Jairo Acosta before the Bogota High Court mentions that Bastidas Huertas may have committed the crime of murder. forewarning by actionIt is provided in the Law No. 599 of 2000.
(We leave you: the prosecution remains: insists that the peace spokesmen not be released)
In a statement released Wednesday, the Bogota Judicial Services Center addressed the issue, stating: acted according to the lawtherefore they believe that there is no irregularity on the part of their officials.
“According to the Circular No. 001 of the Presidency of the High Council of Judiciary, dated 19 January 2005, the defendants who were deprived of their liberty by the decision of the “Guarantee Control Judge,” the coordinator will remain at the disposal of the judge They shared from Paloquemao, “Centre of Forensic Services”.
Regarding the disciplinary complaint sent to the judges of the National Judicial Disciplinary Commission, it also two resolutions (293 and 298 of December 15, 2022), where Márquez and Bermeo were appointed as spokespersons for peace.
The government’s submissions to the judge arrived via two emails at 12:38 pm on 20 December. Office of the High Commissioner for Peace. According to the complaint, the requests were fulfilled by Bastidas, who ordered the suspension of arrest warrants for those detained for alleged vandalism during the national strike. “Despite the foregoing, there are serious inconsistencies that, in the belief of the undersigned, question the legality of the decision in question,” said attorney Acosta.
(We leave it to you: Why does the prosecutor say there were irregularities in the release of the peace spokesmen?)
Another objection was directed directly at Government decisions and inconsistencies with the Attorney General’s point of view because “there is no record, or rather, no information of the existence of any document proving the allegation.” the operand will hold either of these two conditionsIn other words, it has been determined that they are members of social or humanitarian aid organizations, and on the contrary, they have established relations with pro-violent radical groups in accordance with the legally valid facts stated in the indictment.
With all of the above, the Public Ministry requests the National Judicial Disciplinary Commission to find out why the coordinating judge made this decision and acted accordingly. “simple processor”when asked to make an analysis “from a point of view, in the light of the normative bodies on which they are or are intended to be based”, to determine whether it is constitutional and legally fit to serve them”.
Among the failures that Bastidas Huertas could commit could be violations of duties, such as allowing representatives of the Public Ministry to have immediate access to places where they are required to conduct their actions and investigations.
Finally, another alleged inconsistency of the judge, according to the Attorney General’s Office, states that it “will occur” in section 65 of Law No. 1952 of 2019.
serious mistake To objectively perform a typical definition of what is considered a crime punishable by law as fraud, if committed or misused with reason, on the occasion or as a result of office or position.
On Twitter: @CarlosL49
[email protected]
Source: Exame
I am Bret Jackson, a professional journalist and author for Gadget Onus, where I specialize in writing about the gaming industry. With over 6 years of experience in my field, I have built up an extensive portfolio that ranges from reviews to interviews with top figures within the industry. My work has been featured on various news sites, providing readers with insightful analysis regarding the current state of gaming culture.
