The company argues that AB 587 is unconstitutional and could lead to censorship. X argues that the real purpose of the law is to force social media companies to remove content deemed problematic by the government that could violate constitutionally protected freedom of expression.

Supporters of AB 587 argue that transparency should be increased on the largest platforms. The bill’s author, Jesse Gabriel, responded to X’s lawsuit by saying that if a company has nothing to hide, it shouldn’t object to the bill.

Source: Ferra

Previous articleGurman: Apple will not hold a presentation in October
Next articleCerabyte ceramic storage will increase computer memory to 10 PetabytesComputers15:28 | 09 September 2023
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here