Vivo X100 and iQOO 12 have many similar features. But what is it really like?

Both smartphones have similar color reproduction when comparing daytime photos. However, in Vivo X100 the tone is a little richer and brighter, and in iQOO 12 it is more natural.

The iQOO 12 still had a slight advantage over the Vivo X100 when using zoom.

Vivo’s algorithms definitely work better when it comes to portrait shots. This is especially true for skin tones: they look quite natural. Overall, the Vivo X100 is a more versatile camera for portrait photography. The same can be said for selfie shots.

that slide
I chose this instead of advertising.
that slide
I chose this instead of advertising.
that slide
I chose this instead of advertising.
that slide
I chose this instead of advertising.

In low light, both devices cope well. But Vivo has more details and better dynamic range.

The iQOO 12 can record video up to 8K, while the Vivo X100 can record up to 4K 60fps. Both smartphones have excellent stabilization when shooting at 4K 60fps. However, the telephoto lens is slightly better on the iQOO 12.

The main difference between Vivo X100 and iQOO 12 is the quality of portrait shots. Vivo does a better job in this regard. This smartphone was also better at selfie photos and video recording. That’s why he was a winner.

Source: Ferra

Previous articleAn American startup has developed a tool to find errors in the productive Institute of Science and Technology09:45 | January 10, 2024
Next articleCES 2024 Volkswagen will add ChatGPT to the multimedia system of its cars
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here