10 mobile operating systems that failed

The development process on any technological front brings with it successful products and others that fail to attract public attention. This happens on several fronts, including operating systems.

In the list below, we will talk about some mobile operating systems that fail for various reasons. Have you contacted any of them?

10.Symbian

Symbian was a pioneering platform in mobile devices and was widely used by Nokia in its smartphones from the 1990s until about 2010. It started primarily in personal assistants, but gained traction across operating systems after it was acquired by Nokia.

But its failure was partly due to its outdated user interface and the difficulty of developing apps compared to rivals like iOS and Android.

Moreover, Nokia was slow to adapt to market changes and keep up with the rapid development of mobile technology, which contributed to the disappearance of Symbian.

9.NokiaX

Speaking of Nokia, let’s now move on to Nokia X. This mobile operating system proposal was promising, at least initially: It combines elements of the Linux Kernel and Android OS with the Windows Phone interface.

However, the lack of support from the developer community and the confusion created by mixing two different platforms resulted in the system suffering. Additionally, Microsoft acquired Nokia shortly after the launch of the Nokia X, resulting in the discontinuation of the line.

8. Bada

Developed by Samsung and introduced to the world in 2010, Bada was an operating system that did not attract serious attention due to the intense competition from iOS and Android.

To this list, we can add its limited features compared to its established competitors, as well as the lack of a robust application ecosystem. For this reason, it entered the list of failed mobile operating systems in 2013, when its production was stopped.

7.MeeGo

MeeGo was an open source mobile operating system designed for mobile and embedded devices, developed by Nokia and Intel. However, only one device used the new features it introduced: Nokia N9.

MeeGo has even received praise for its intuitive interface and solid performance, but has suffered from a lack of support from hardware manufacturers and app developers. Because, Nokia chose to abandon this system in favor of Windows Phoneeffectively sealed his fate.

6.Tizen

Developed primarily by Samsung, Tizen faced challenges similar to those faced by Bada. But unlike the other cases we’ve mentioned here, it still had a chance of relative success.

While Tizen has been adopted in some devices, including Samsung smartwatches and smart TVs, it has failed to gain significant adoption in the smartphone market. Reason? Lack of third-party apps and dominance of Android and iOS.

5.Blackberry operating system

Blackberry OS, formerly known as RIM OS, was widely used on Blackberry devices and played a major role in the smartphone market before the rise of iOS and Android.

Despite the excellent use of the physical keyboard and good acceptance in the corporate world, it failed in the process. In this case, we can blame you. outdated interface, lack of support for third-party applications and the lack of power to compete with iPhones and Android devices.

4.Palm OS

Palm OS was released in 1996, when touch-screen devices were still new. This system was relatively successful until the early 2000s. but lack of support and other technical issues, not to mention the dominance of iOS and Android.

3.webOS

Anyone who has an LG smart TV has surely come into contact with webOS. Created in 2009, this product has received high praise for its innovative interface, efficient multitasking, and seamless integration with cloud-based services. But the lack of support from app developers and the growth of Android and iOS pushed it aside.

2.Firefox operating system

Developed by Mozilla, Firefox OS It was an attempt to create a mobile operating system based on open web standards. However, lack of hardware support, poor performance and lack of third-party applications contributed to the failure.

For this reason, Mozilla discontinued the development of Firefox OS in 2016, reducing the number of mobile operating systems.

1.Ubuntu Phone

Finally, we can’t forget Ubuntu Phone, Canonical’s 2013 attempt to create a mobile operating system based on Ubuntu Linux.

Although Ubuntu Phone initially attracted the attention of tech enthusiasts, it faced difficulties attracting the attention of hardware manufacturers and application developers. The lack of support from popular apps and the continued dominance of iOS and Android ultimately sealed its fate.

Have you ever used any of these operating systems? Share your opinion with other readers TecMundo in our social networks. To the next one!