In addition to the Test Stand, the Matpays SBR A520M Challenger/Asrock B550M Phantom Gaming 4 (for AM4) and Asus Prime B650M-K (for AM5), RAM Netac Shadow S 2×16 GB DDR4 32 GB and Video Card DDR5 32 GB 2×16 GB, Video Memory DDR5 SHD SHB 2, GB 2×16 GB, Video Memory DDR5 32 32 GB 2×16 GB, TB, Pentawawave PC-Z05E more cooler for processor, Gamemax GP-500G power supply, army allocation EVO-8227.
All tests were performed on two permission: 1080r and 1440 rubles. In addition, there were games with RT: Dragons Dogma II, Hogwarts Legacy, Cyberpunk 2077, Spider Man 2, Witcher 3, Star Wars Jedi Survivor.
You can know the following average measurements.
In CS2, approximately the same average FPS, which has graphic settings at full HD in processors, already causes acceleration of 5600: 280 to/s 261 c/s and 286 c/s 267 k/s in the stock in 1440R.
Hunt Showdown also started with a user’s front setting. There was no difference between the processors on both traces.
On average, without RT 8400F, with 1080r, 1440 rubles – 1 FPS or 5600 in 3 FPS. With the RT for average FPS, the processor was faster than an opponent at 8400F, FHD – QHD in 9 – 5 to 5 disaster.
You can see all results in games below the video.
If we talk about productivity in rasterization, the Ryzen 5600 is still well dealing well. Of course, there are projects where the difference is really noticeable, but it is not a disaster. If you are going to add 1080r, shadows and DLSS to the reflection, it is better to get 8400F. In general, it is better to buy a more modern AM5 platform.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
