Incredible and unpublished: a murdered person is reborn as AI in order to confront his killer in court

The fact that, first of all around the world, artificial intelligence (AI) believed the murdered person to turn to his killer at the hearing of the sentence.

Christopher Pelki Four years ago, he was shot dead as a result of anger at the steering wheel in Cendler, Arizona, but recently AI was used to recreate the digital version of the victim, which was allowed to make a statement during the trial, the local news site reports.

Video -presentation also included real ping clips to give those present in court a more clear understanding of their personality. Some of these clips were also used to create an image of Pelkey, generated AI, which you can see below.

In the video reproduced in court, the version of Pelka says: “For Gabriel Horkasitas, the person who shot me, it is a pity that we were that day in such circumstances. In another life, we could be friends.

And he continues: “I believe in forgiveness and in God who forgives. I always did it, and I still do it. “

After watching the video, Judge Todd Lang said: “I like this AI. Thanks for that. I felt that it was genuine, that his obvious forgiveness to Mr. Horkasitas reflects the character I heard today. ”

This week, the judge sentenced Horcasitas to ten and a half years for involuntarily the murder of Pelka.

It was Chris Pelly’s sister, Staisi, who came up with the idea of ​​using AI to create an image of her brother for use in court. He said that it is important “not to force Chris to say what I feel, disconnect me and let him say because he said things that will never go out of his mouth, but I know that they will leave their own.”

Ann A. Scott Timmer, the president of the Arizona Supreme Court, commented that AI can “create great effectiveness in the justice system and can help those who are not indicated in the law to better present their positions. For this reason, we are glad of the potential of AI. ”

Timmer added: “But the II can also interfere or even change justice if they are inappropriately used. The best is a measured approach. In this sense, the court created the AI ​​Committee to study the use of AI and gives recommendations on the better way to use it. Those who use AI, including courts, are responsible for their accuracy.

In fact, although the use of AI thus provides a powerful and deeply personal element for judicial procedures, it also causes several ethical and legal problems about authenticity, emotional influence and appropriate application. As a result, other courts, according to the visible, can develop leading principles for future cases if they decide to resolve the statements of the victims generated by AI.