Some experts, including archaeologists, anthropologists, and even forensic scientists, use a variety of clues, such as the size and shape of bones, to determine whether human remains belong to a man or a woman. However, gender activist archaeologists argue that it’s impossible to determine from bones how early humans “identified themselves”.
Last week, Canadian graduate student Emma Palladino made a controversial tweet on the subject. She is doing a master’s degree in archeology, she. This means that he will perhaps be working on archaeological projects in the near future and that his “finds” could be in the history books forever. In a 10-tweet post, she described the methodology used by archaeologists to determine the sex of human remains as “stupid.”
In addition, Associate Professor Jennifer Ruff of the University of Kansas published an article titled Origins: A Genetic History of America in February 2022, where she argued that it was impossible to distinguish between “male” or “female” individuals physically or genetically. She suggested that it was impossible to determine the gender of the 9000-year-old Peruvian hunter because no one knew “how this person described himself.” She also argued that the androgynous system was imposed by “Christian colonists” she said.
In fact, the concepts of “gender identity” are included in scientific research. But still, regardless of what gender a particular person considers himself to be, genes never change.
Source: Ferra
