Trendy diets do not cease year after year to present us with new surprises. From miracle weight loss diets and useless food supplements to Albert Einstein’s diet through diets celebrities like Victoria Beckham: fangirl edible nonsense it floods every corner of the web immensely. A new nutritional guide that has been made known to celebrities is linked to Marta Thorne, a famous Spanish actress who claims to include a large number of organic products in your diet.

But what is organic food? Does this food name guarantee that the product is healthier? Can these products give us the elixir of eternal youth? There is nothing further from reality.

Sometimes we see New Zealand kiwis wrapped in offensive amounts of plastic on supermarket shelves. In addition, they are often accompanied occasionally very nice green stamp which makes them ecological. This is one of the many contradictions that organic products offer us today: they are not even remotely a guarantee of sustainability.

What does organic really mean?

What about health? Can we say that food is more sustainable, no matter how many organic certifications it contains? For the majority of people, “environmental” tone immediately associated with better, healthier, and even tastier foods. However, there is no guarantee that this will be the case. The only condition that a food product must meet to be considered organic is compliance with European law guidelines on the subject.

You should know that both “ecological” and “bio” or “organic” mean the same thing: there is no difference between these terms. Currently, the legal aspects governing this issue are defined in the Regulation 2018/848 of the European Union. Here we are told that the goals of organic food environment protectionMaintenance long term soil fertility, concern for animal welfare and biodiversity, among other things. In addition, to consider production as organic, some of the following points are met:

  • The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is strictly prohibited.
  • Animal husbandry must adapt to the place and have a close relationship with the well-being of the soil.
  • The use of artificial fertilizers, pesticides, fertilizers and hormones, as well as additives, is limited wherever possible.

In short, all the issues mentioned under organic food legislation are mainly related to sustainability and environmental issues: nothing about health. Thus, there are no legal guarantees proving the health benefits of consuming organic food. An “ecological” name behaves only as a seal or accreditation based on certain standards, it does not go beyond that. Recall that organic pears and apples are not only: organic muffins are also sold in large quantities.

Luckily we have scientific evidence to shed light in this agricultural question: science has given interesting results confirming this assumption. One of the largest and most comprehensive scientific reviews of ecology to date, published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, concluded that organic foods are not much more nutritious than conventional foods.

Organic eggs make sense

Almost every traditional food has its green alter ego in today’s market. Fruits and vegetables are usually the main protagonists, but there are also animal products labeled “eco”. From chicken meat and pork cutlets to eggs: organic food hits all the sticks. Eggs are a great example of the real benefits that organic labeling can have. Not everything had to be bad.

The number 0 printed on the shell of some organic eggs indicates that the hens use organic production. In this sense, we see improvement of animal welfare what chickens have since they have access to the open air. In addition, legislation requires that the majority of their feed come from organic products. On the other hand, eggs marked with number 1 come from free-range hens, and category 2 and 3 eggs are equivalent to floor and cage-raised eggs, respectively. The latter are the two worst possible categories for chickens, as the animals have very little room to move and see little to no sunlight.

Real Organic Food: Intimacy

As we mentioned at the beginning, Martha Thorne has featured a healthy diet based on organic foods on her social media. And that’s great: it’s a positive diet for health. But not due to environmentalbut because it is based on a high proportion of wholesome foods such as fruits, vegetables, legumes and fish. It doesn’t matter if they are “eco” or not.

It also says to avoid sugar and processed foods, which of course implies a healthy lifestyle choice, albeit with some nuance. Not all processed foods are unhealthy: Canned fish, deep-frozen vegetables, cold soups such as gazpacho or salmorejo, and creams such as hummus or guacamole are completely healthy.

In addition, the Spanish actress admits that she bases her diet on the consumption of seasonal fruits and vegetables, as well as local meat and fish. And here we find the key to the case. Local, related products true ecological that we must consume. Why? Well, because they make up food grown or produced in our nearby geographic area with a much lower environmental impact, and it also contributes to the development of the local economy, our neighborhoods and nearby areas.

Just because organic food isn’t healthier or more nutritious than regular food doesn’t mean it’s no longer interesting to consume. In some cases, organic food can help us improve sustainability and the environmentbut if we buy local and close. Not if they come from the other side of the world, wrapped in plastic in abundance. Remember: You don’t have to search the supermarket for a green label “eco” or “bio” to find products that are environmentally friendly.

Source: Hiper Textual

Previous articleWhatsApp: What happens to the account when a user dies?
Next articleStudio Display: details of the new Apple display


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here