OpenAI, the artificial intelligence company responsible for creating the controversial rendering program DALL-E, released a text version of the chatbot at the end of November: ChatGPT that promises to write intelligently and humanelyimpressive as well as leaving many writers with “fleas behind the ear” (does the program know the phrase?).
Many people impressed with the new feature will use ChatGPT with all code blocks, TV show scenarios and of course Articles and academic studies exactly like our well-known TCCs. It provoked fear that from now on students will cheat on their final assignments.
“We’re witnessing the death of academic writing in real time,” a Google strategist told social media soon after the usual doomsday doomsday critters. But things are not like that, he argued in an interview. inside information Professor Stuart Selber of Pennsylvania State University.
What do teachers say?
Selber said he wasn’t “a big fan of melancholy or apocalypse.” inside information With OpenAI’s ChatGPT, look no further than recent developments in pseudo-literary technologies, including Word, Wikipedia, and Google itself, all touted as the end of theses and reviews.
Although the English teacher may seem “Very good in the abstract”, addressing specific or local issues, creating an original argument, and in principle, interweaving of hypothesesrather than repeating them mechanically, he argues.
Leah Henrikson, another professor at the University of Leeds, points to another key issue. As these tools continue to evolve, It’s up to the universities to do that, too. What ChatGPT “does well” is to focus on critical analysis and judgment, which is an inherently human skill rather than formatting and storing information.
Source: Tec Mundo
