Satiety Apple against Digital Markets Act (DMA) is becoming more and more noticeable. Cupertino residents challenged the extent of regulation of their products and services on Tuesday. General Court of the European Union.
Reportedly BloombergLawyer Daniel Beard, representing Apple, blamed the law for making important changes to its ecosystem. These include iOS compatibility and changes to the App Store. While the story doesn’t end there, it also aims to prevent another investigation into iMessage.
As has happened many times recently, Apple criticized the Digital Markets Act for its assumptions. negative effects about user safety and privacy, as well as about innovation and company ownership.
So Apple’s new protest against the Digital Markets Act focuses on three decisive moments:
- Apple officials argue that forcing the iPhone and its software to work with third-party devices and services poses a privacy, security and intellectual property risk. On paper, the Digital Markets Act suggests that, for example, the experience of using and operating a third-party smartwatch is identical to the experience of using an Apple Watch when connected to an iPhone. Apple already appealed the order last June, arguing it created an “unreasonable, costly” process and slowed innovation.
- In addition, they believe that the implementation of the Digital Markets Act in relation to the App Store is inappropriate. Apple indicates that its application store does not meet the definition of a single service established by the regulations. The European Commission has already fined Cupertino $500 million, although it later appealed the penalty. Earlier this month, it was reported that Californians were expected to reach an agreement to avoid additional daily penalties for non-compliance.
- Finally, Apple believes that the European Commission should not have investigated whether iMessage was covered by the Digital Markets Act. Since the communication platform existing in the Messages app does not directly generate revenue, the company believes that the entire procedure was carried out unnecessarily.
Apple launches new round against Digital Markets Act
According to Beard at the General Court of the European Union, the Digital Markets Act imposes “an extremely burdensome and intrusive burden” this negatively affects Apple’s rights in the Old Continent.
This is no doubt the latest in the open battle between Apple and the European Commission over the Digital Markets Act. Cupertino issued a strongly worded statement last month blaming the legislation for stifling innovation, creating unnecessary security risks, jeopardizing user privacy and delaying the rollout of new features in the region. But the matter did not end there.
Apple too demanded repeal of the Digital Markets Act and its replacement with “appropriate legislation”. In addition, he demanded that if the DMA could not be overturned, his application should be left in the hands of an independent European agency. In this way, Tim Cook’s people argued that any possible political interference could be avoided.
The reaction to these claims from Europe was not long in coming. Regulators noted that they do not plan to repeal the rules or change competent authorities on this issue. We’ll see what happens next, but it’s clear that The last page of the soap opera has not yet been written.
Source: Hiper Textual

I’m Ben Stock, a highly experienced and passionate journalist with a career in the news industry spanning more than 10 years. I specialize in writing content for websites, including researching and interviewing sources to produce engaging articles. My current role is as an author at Gadget Onus, where I mainly cover the mobile section.