One of the most common fines DHT Different cars have different fines. speedsanctions that can be carried out by a road agent or directly by any of the thousands of radars that are located on our roads, radars, which must meet a number of technical requirements for the penalty to be validand they don’t always meet.
And it is that if any of the DGT radars that supplied us with these fines the speeds that hindered us so much end up faltering, they are not quite well located or do not comply with the technical regulations, they may end up demanding finessomething that most people don’t usually do.
Well, now DGT can be forced to withdraw thousands and thousands of fines, because one of the radars located in 13.66 km of the A-66 in the direction of Gijón-Aviles it appears to be out of specification, as a recent complaint for which we already have a resolution demonstrated.
The judgment declares the operation of this radar on the A-66 unacceptable, which has so far imposed a total of 7,074 fines for a total amount that was 737,600 euros this year, one of the radars that collect the most in the entire region and all fines imposed may be cancelled.
It started on February 24, 2021, when this radar took a picture of a driver driving at 133 km/h, 13 km/h more than the legal limit, and received a €100 fine, which did not convince the sanctioned user.
So he put himself in the hands of a lawyer and, looking at the technical standards they realized that the radar had taken only one photograph, when the official rules required two photographs to issue a fine..
A sentence that could void thousands of fines
The order governing the technical control of these devices states that if the radar is unable to track the suspect, at least two shots of the intruder car taken at different times will be required. One of these moments will show a panoramic view of automobile while the other is to display the vehicle identification plate.
Since in this case the sanction was accompanied only by a photograph, the magistrate granted the driver’s complaint and waived the fine, concluding that technical standards had not been observed.
Specifically, this radar is a model Multanova 6F-MRand now the user’s lawyer believes that DGT”should initiate the procedure and cancel all fines“.
Source: Computer Hoy
