The Court of Arbitration for Sport (TAS for its French acronym) delivered its decision in the arbitration procedure between the Peruvian Football Federation (FPF).Chilean Football Federation (FFC), Ecuadorian Football Federation (FEF), player Byron Castillo Segura (Player) and Fifa.
The Arbitration Body responsible for this arbitration partially accepted the appeals made by the FPF and the FFC and overturned the Commission’s decision.
15 September 2022 Fifa appeal.
This is the decision of the TSK.
(You can read: Byron Castillo blew: the last thing he said about his nationality).
The FEF is held liable for the use of a document containing false information in violation of Article 21 of the Fifa Disciplinary Code and is therefore sanctioned under Article 6 of the Fifa Disciplinary Code as follows:
(No) A 3-point deduction is applied to the FEF during the next qualifying phase for the World Cup.
(ii) FEF is decided to pay a fine of CHF 100,000 to Fifa within 30 days of notification of the award.
The discussion is linked fit of actor Byron David Castillo Segura Participate in matches of the Ecuadorian Football Federation (FEF) national team from September 2021 to March 2022, corresponding to the Conmebol qualifiers for the 2022 FIFA World Cup.
(Also: Piqué, consolation: Clara Chía’s unexpected reaction during her harsh farewell).
It was decided unanimously, taking into account the following issues, as reported by TMS:
– FEF has not violated Article 22 of the Fifa Disciplinary Code as the Player is eligible to qualify for the 2022 Fifa World Cup qualifying phase.
The nationality of a player to play in a national federation is determined by national law. player qualified to play for Ecuador national team Since the Ecuadorian authorities recognized that he is an Ecuadorian citizen.
– FEF, using Article 21 of the Fifa Code of Discipline
document containing false information. FIFA does not refer to national law for counterfeiting cases.
Consequently, for Fifa it is not necessary to prove that a decision by the judicial authorities of Ecuador regarding the falsification of the player’s passport is not necessary to prove this circumstance. the document is wrongPursuant to Article 21 of the Fifa Disciplinary Code.
In the present case, although it is true that the player’s Ecuadorian passport is genuine, The information on the passport in question was incorrect.
Specifically, Arbitration Training was convinced that the place and date of birth in the player’s passport were incorrect. The actor was born on June 25, 1995 in Tumaco, Colombia.
As a result, Arbitration Education acknowledges that the FEF is liable for an act of forgery pursuant to article 21, paragraph 2 of the Fifa Disciplinary Code, even if the author of the forged document only used it.
The Arbitration Body considers that the eligibility rules have not been violated and that there have been a number of extenuating circumstances, including the FEF’s initiation of disciplinary proceedings against the paralyzed player by order of the Ecuadorian judicial authority. .
The Arbitration Formation has determined that the 3 point deduction should be applied in the next edition, not in the qualifying phase of the 2022 Fifa World Cup. player qualified to play in the 2022 FIFA World Cup qualifying stage and considering that the competition in question was not affected by the above-mentioned breach of the FEF.
SPORTS
Source: Exame
