Film criticism is a twentieth-century phenomenon that has become increasingly important in film analysis over time. In the early decades of the industry, opinions in the press and radio were an indicator of media interest in a product. But as specialized opinions have become relevant to providing audiences with a better experience in theatres, it has become an element to be taken into account. In the 1950s and subsequent reflections on cinema Jean-Luc Godard, Roger Ebert And Jose Luis Garner They were instrumental in understanding cinema and the business it entails. Much more, becoming a profitable source of income.
At the start of the millennium, critical acclaim is of interest to both film buffs and executives behind the camera. From terrible Rotten Tomatoes ratings to prestigious reviews from The Guardian. Film criticism plays a key role in understanding contemporary cinema and analyzing it as an artistic discipline in question. Also consider his evolution and the weight of his legacy.
subscribe to Star+ and you will have access to the best TV series and exclusive films How Stranger, Simpson, X-Men And the walking Dead. Includes Star originals And all sports from espnlike La Liga, Champions League and Formula 1.
Combo+ He final package which will allow you to save while enjoying all Disney+, Star+ and all ESPN sports content, including football from the best leagues in the world. The best package at the best price
We leave you with five films that demonstrate the importance of this assessment. From the second installment of an Eighties classic to becoming an Oscar winner, he has found himself at the center of a curious controversy. All so that you can enjoy a wide selection of stories and especially, You can analyze how the criticism is right or wrong depending on the cases.
Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleeps
Critics wondered aloud whether the 2010 film, directed by Oliver Stone, could live up to the level of its predecessor. In fact, much of the debate surrounding this issue is whether this sequel to the 1987 film Wall Street was necessary. Especially if we talk about the story of an ambitious investor. Gordon Gekko, played by Michael Douglas.
At least this attempt was worthy of the success of the first film. The plot takes place during the economic crisis of 2008. After spending several years in prison for financial crimes, Gordon Gekko (Douglas playing again) released. Therefore, he strives to restore his life and relationship with his daughter. Vinny (Carey Mulligan). Meanwhile, a young businessman Jacob Moore (Shia LaBeouf) becomes Gordon’s protégé. Eventually the latter’s predatory nature takes over, and he leads Jacob into the center of financial turmoil and unbridled greed.
The script centers on greed, business ethics and the impact of fraudulent decisions on the stock market, a la the original film. It also examines the dangers of unchecked capitalism and irresponsibility in the stock market sector. Is this enough to be considered a modern classic? Critics made it clear that this attempt was a well-told story about the world of power, but without achieving the same effect as the first. This is perhaps the lowest point.
Fucking bastards
Some critics have called this narrative experiment the pure essence of director Quentin Tarantino’s worldview. There is no doubt that the film is that, but it is also a demonstration of the flexibility of cinematic language to tell great stories. Even the ones that turn a real story into something completely new and strange.
In some ways, the film is historical fiction set during World War II. The script tells the story of a group of Jewish American soldiers known as the “Basterds” whose mission is to hunt and kill Nazis in occupied France. But from this point on it turns into an achrony, which gives the argument a new perspective. This is if you imagine what could have happened if Hitler had died before the end of the war. As if that wasn’t enough, he was killed by one of his victims.
Within this premise, the film deals with themes of revenge, justice, and the brutality of war. The director uses his signature style to create a brutal story full of intense dialogue, which at the same time is connected with mocking subtext. What did the film do? a box office success and one of the most critically acclaimed.
Top shooter Maverick
Late sequel to a hit like the one best gun Tony Scott, represents a danger that few studios dare to take. But about this, The key to their victory was the return of actor Tom Cruise.
In fact, much of the film’s strengths come from its clever use of nostalgia rather than telling a story entirely reliant on the former. On the contrary, it is an independent narrative, with a broad context, the source of which is the cult film of the 1980s.
The result was a film that surprised critics for many good reasons. He didn’t try to deconstruct his character or give him a more ambiguous or less optimistic view of the world than the one he had when he entered cinema. On the contrary, he delved into his life carefully and with a good pulse, creating a feature film that surprises in its simplicity and aims, at its core, to entertain. From its acrobatic practical effects shots to the emotional growth of the memorable Maverick. The performance is a gift for fans, as well as action movie lovers. The element that the trade press has highlighted the most since its premiere.
City of Stars: La La Land.
The musical, directed by Damien Chazelle, wowed audiences and divided critics. Moreover, this is something between a romantic story and an allegory about the value of art as part of personal aspirations. The plot tells the story My (Emma Stone), aspiring actress and Sebastian (Ryan Reynolds) jazz pianist. Together they chase their dreams in Los Angeles and end up falling in love. A feeling that will test your ambitions and decisions.
The director paid great attention to combining the atmosphere of classic Hollywood cinema with modern aesthetics. This gave the film a nostalgic touch and also opened a new chapter in one of the most popular genres of the seventh art. And this is against a backdrop of reflection on the difficulties of balancing personal ambitions and mutual obligations. Also, delve into the ephemeral nature of success and how the decisions we make can impact our lives..
It is curious that, most likely, in addition to the sensational plot and high praise from critics, the film will be remembered for an unforeseen circumstance. At the end of the 2017 Oscars, actor Warren Beatty got the name wrong and declared the film the winner of the ceremony’s best. Only to later prove that it was a mistake. The real winner was Moonlight by Barry Jenkins.
Eccentrics Tenenbaum
This critically acclaimed work was released in 2001 and is one of Wes Anderson’s most beloved works. The film tells the story of the peculiar Tenenbaum family. consists of talented and eccentric characters who reunite after years of separation.
The script became an object of analysis and surprise, intelligently showing how members Tenenbaum family They struggle to cope with their talents and emotional problems. Father, Royal Tenenbaum (Gene Hackman) pretends to have cancer and reunites his family to reconcile with them.
subscribe to Star+ and you will have access to the best TV series and exclusive films How Stranger, Simpson, X-Men And the walking Dead. Includes local production Star originals And all sports from espnlike La Liga, Champions League or NBA.
Star+ is only available in Latin America
As the story progresses, the complex connections between the strange participants and how they cope with their insecurities and failures are explored. A small comedy with elements of Greek tragedy. who surprised the specialized press with his subtle insight into complex feelings.
Source: Hiper Textual
