In 2017, Netflix released the first season of the series. Confession tapesA true crime focused on a controversial premise. This is a demonstration that convictions of those accused of various crimes are based on false confessions. That is, coercion, pressure and even supposed deals with various prosecutors’ offices, which turned out to be false promises of officers and officials. The first season looked at the case of Atif Rafay and Sebastian Burns, in which the former was accused of murdering his parents. Production started off on a strong foot.
He devoted part of the seven episodes to raising doubts about completed trials or the non-appealability of the verdict. And soon there was widespread debate about whether creator and director Kelly Laudenberg was simply speculating or giving a voice to defense strategies. Particularly when several cases and their confessions were analyzed through aggressive interrogation techniques. All this indicates direct pressure on the accused.
After all, the Netflix series, which premiered its second season in 2019, became yet another controversial docuseries on the platform. But this is not the only case. We leave you with five controversial Netflix content that you can watch right now. From the story of a murder mixed with the unethical use of artificial intelligence, to the exploration of the criminal through chilling conversations. Ideal for lovers of the weird, uncomfortable and provocative.
What did Jennifer do?
Directed by Jenny Popplewell, the documentary, available on Netflix, delves into the controversial case of Jennifer Pan, who is accused of planning a plot to kill her parents. This 2010 baffling case in Canada has become a national obsession. That’s what the production, released on Netflix last year, shows step by step.
But the film resonated with something completely different. Amid controversy over the gory details of Peng’s killings, Futurism He noted that these could be serious manipulations. This is because when analyzing the photographic material used in the program, it seemed at least modified or directly created by artificial intelligence.
Although the image was not related to a crime scene, the ability to use digital resources to alter audiovisual material created a stir. Moreover, this is a reconstruction of a real event of a very serious nature. The point of view that made What did Jennifer do?, in one of the most controversial content on Netflix.
Tiger King: Murder, Mayhem and Madness
The controversial series, which has two seasons and 12 episodes on Netflix, is necessarily controversial. From conviction, request for presidential pardon to disappearance. There are plenty of stories of conflict between owners – almost always outlaws – of big cats. But much more because the plot focuses its interest on two contradictory personalities.
On one side is Carole Baskin, owner of Big Cat Rescue. Having taken part in a crusade to save tigers, lions and other animals, she is willing to do anything to avoid irresponsible captivity. This will lead him to confront Joe Exotic (Joseph Allen Maldonado-Passage), the owner of the Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park. The latter is an extravagant character, with an explosive personality, obsessed with fame and celebrities. Plus, with a dark past that needs to be hidden.
The result is a head-on collision between the two in the midst of a chaotic, violent and grotesque scene. Between criminal charges, Joe Exotic’s 21-year prison sentence, and even asking President Trump to intervene, the series leans toward sensationalism. So much so that the most enduring part of its premise is the scandal, and a very small one, about the protection of abused animals that is at the center of the controversy. A controversial turn no matter how you look at it.
Twin Flames: How to Put out a Fire
Over the past ten years, sects and cults have become a dangerous and growing situation. That’s what this three-chapter documentary series demonstrates in detail. In particular, to better understand why the Internet is an ideal place for the spread of pseudo-religious organizations with messianic characteristics.
This is a case of organization double flamefounded by Jeff and Shaleia Devine. Originally conceived as an online coaching group focused on relationships, the initiative soon grew in membership and ambition. But it was during the pandemic that it turned into a multi-level company, and then into a mystical cult with iron commandments and recommendations that must be followed. What does control include? from the romantic relationships between its members to how they express their gender identity.
But the documentary becomes more controversial, showing seemingly evidence of manipulation, coercion and violence against members. A controversial panorama covering gender confirmation procedures. Featuring former cult members, relatives of current members and psychiatrists, the documentary explores the cult in detail. A point of view that has caused controversy and pending an official statement from the organization distancing itself from the allegations.
From Murder to Mercy: The Story of Cyntoia Brown
Daniel H. Bierman explores in this documentary the story of Cyntoia Brown, a teenage prostitute who killed a 43-year-old man who had abused her. The case, rife with legal irregularities ranging from Brown waiving her Miranda rights to her trial as an adult, has become emblematic. Especially when celebrities like Kim Kardashian, Rihanna and Cara Delevingne, among others, They became interested in this case and managed to make it public.
Finally, in January 2019, thanks to pressure from the media and lawyers, Brown received a pardon and managed to leave prison. Her long journey to find justice and redemption was chronicled in the 2011 documentary Facing Life: The Cyntoia Story, which Bierman himself directed. Cyntoia Brown will attend the public debate.
However, Bierman’s second documentary lacks the sensitivity of the previous one. Moreover, the participation of the protagonist is limited and for the second part it is only a reflection on the matter. This was conducted among panels of legal experts and did not take into account Brown’s views.
What has caused discomfort around documentaries, especially because it is considered unnecessary in relation to the previous one. Finally, the production found itself at the center of controversy when Brown told the press that a documentary about his life had not received his permission.
Conversations with Killers: The Jeffrey Dahmer Tapes
The third installment in Joe Berlinger’s anthology, which chronicles journalistic conversations with killers, offers nothing new in its format. Or at least not too different from the two productions that preceded it. Just like Ted Bundy Records And John Wayne Gacy Tapesdedicated to Dahmer replays the killer’s conversations with various journalists. None of them have police surveillance or restrictions.therefore, the sinister protagonist has complete freedom to explore from his own point of view.
But unlike previous seasons, Jeffrey Dahmer tapes They become tortuous, more and more graphic, and closer to absurdity than documentation. Which caused controversy, as well as a question in various media about the value and the real importance of experience.
Source: Hiper Textual
