It’s normal that successful productions bring great satisfaction to filmmakers. Filmmakers, actors and producers often have fond professional memories of their work. But what happens when it leads to adverse effects? What happens to those uncomfortable thoughts that visit the filmmakers from time to time? In this sense, Steven Spielberg have something to say about Shark.
Shark This is one of the key films of modern cinema. In a specific genre, horror, the production is canon, one of those films that is considered a must for anyone interested in this kind of plot. Its reputation is such that it has been passed down from generation to generation as movie shared that describes something different: a way of making movies that might seem strange in today’s eyes.
Steven Spielberg with Sharkredefined several issues related to this type of production. This is about movie studied in different fields to understand and manage cinematic concepts. Its peak not only stopped there because the film went out of theaters. This is one aspect that its director regretted, embarrassed that his work had influenced the image of this animal.
Crying Steven Spielberg
after Shark
The film was released in 1975 and has survived as a classic ever since. movie what they see and revise in order to be able to decipher it, to have some influence. However, there is something paradoxical: from the point of view of Steven Spielberg, the production influenced the construction of a negative image in relation to these animals.
It was mentioned in the program. Desert island discsreleased BBC. His words about how the image of sharks and their hunting has changed were as follows:
“That’s one of the things I still fear: not being eaten by a shark, but the sharks will somehow get mad at me for the crazy recreational fisherman frenzy that happened after 1975. Indeed, to this day, I regret the destruction of the shark population because of the book and the movie.. I’m sorry.”
Portal screen tirade remember that the author of a work published in 1974, Peter Benchley, also expressed a similar opinion. The mention on the postcard is reminiscent of his words: “Knowing what I know now, I could never have written this book today.” This statement was made in 2006. London Daily Express.
To this comment, the author then added:
“Sharks do not attack people and certainly do not hold evil.. There is no such thing as a rogue man-eating shark with a taste of human flesh. In fact, sharks rarely bite people more than once because we are so thin and unappetizing to them.”
According to the investigation National GeographicAn estimated 100 million sharks are killed every year due to hunting. Put a figure, the crying of the author and Steven Spielberg makes sense. Although his works are part of a fictional story, which should not be taken by viewers as an argument in favor of the destruction of species.
Source: Hiper Textual
