Late sequels are always very dangerous projects. On the one hand, let’s think about the intention to recycle old cinematic successes and take advantage of the audience’s nostalgia. On the other hand, the question of whether we need them in every case, whether their very existence is justified narratively and dramatically; and whether what they contribute has real meaning. And we’re happy to say Top Shooter: Maverick it accomplishes what we wanted regarding this question.
No doubt the New Yorker Tom CruiseHollywood celebrity who took on the role of Daniel Cuffey to some good men (1992), Lestat from interview with a Vampire (1994), Ethan Hunt of Mission impossible (1996), Frank McKee of Magnolia (1999) or John Anderton in Minority Report (2002) and what’s here reprises the role of Pete Mitchellyou will be sincerely glad to see director Joseph Kosinski.
Person responsible for TRON: Legacy (2010), who has already directed him to oblivion (2013), not only succeeded in making a childish and incomprehensibly memorable film into a weave similar to the original by the late Tony Scott (1986), to which the second film is accordingly dedicated, to become something larger conceptual entitybut Top Shooter: Maverick tolerates nothing, laying claim to himself, and stands on solid argument base.
Top Gun: Maverick Has More Content Than The Original Movie
The honor and effectiveness of the third film by Joseph Kosinski is largely due to the fact that your emotional core result much more interesting than in the previous feature film due to the fact that the incorrigible aviator Tom Cruise is carrying on his shoulders. In the manner of old Michael Corleone with Al Pacino’s face on Godfather 3 (1990), keeping the obvious distances. What, moreover, allows the actor to offer us a wider range of their interpretive possibilities.
As if that wasn’t enough, and given the usual charisma Jennifer Connellyhere shows magnetic like Penny Benjamin replacing, shall we say, the mediocre Kelly McGillis who played Charlie Blackwood in the first film. So much so that I almost ate a star Top Shooter: Maverick if you’re inattentive for a second. Miles Teller doesn’t disappoint as Bradley Bradshaw, and we’re thrilled to have Val Kilmer’s Tom Kazansky.
And that’s the good work of screenwriters Eren Krueger, Eric Warren Singer and Christopher McQuarrie, with whom Tom Cruise has already collaborated nine times, at the behest of Joseph Kosinski and compared to the work of his colleagues Jim Cash and Jack Epps Jr. for Tony Scott it’s like that involve us in the travails of characters we didn’t give a damn about in his previous adventure and who he made us see again in a sequel like this one. And they deserve recognition.
Joseph Kosinski keeps the spirit and perfects it
But none of these improvements imply neglect compliance with the theme and style eighties Top Shooter: Air Idols. In the sequel, they worry about construction expressive bridge to the present without suggesting a film aging one iota, even musically. The American director’s scheduling with a matching photograph by Claudio Miranda and a steely edit signed by Eddie Hamilton is gratifying.
Especially when plot action in flight what is developing more attractivefast-paced, lengthy, busy, and with twists and turns that serve well to fuel our anxiety. And, as if that weren’t enough, they decide to turn the lead into past scenes and archetypal imagery while keeping the spirit of others that would otherwise have no dramatic logic. A) Yes, Top Shooter: Maverick surpasses Tony Scott’s feature film. Good news.
Source: Hiper Textual
