In his role as head of Xbox and future CEO of Microsoft Gaming, any statement about Phil Spencer Noisy, and rightly so. On this occasion, the performer expressed his opinion about games developed exclusively for a specific platform, and assured that this is a modality without a future.
During an interview with Bloombergclaimed that video games created for one device “this is something we will see less and less”. In addition, he weighed the benefits of multi-platform offerings, although he acknowledged that their impact on the industry can be seen in the long term.
“Perhaps your family is buying an Xbox and I am buying a PlayStation and our kids want to play together but can’t because we bought the wrong piece of plastic to connect to our TVs,” said Phil Spencer. He added: “We really like to bring in more players to reduce friction so that people feel safe while playing, allowing them to find their friends and play with them regardless of the device. I think it’s good for the industry in the long run. And maybe in the short term some people in some companies won’t like it. But I think that when we overcome this hump and see where this industry can continue to grow, it will prove to be true.”
Phil Spencer’s statements are clearly not accidental. Since the acquisition of Activision Blizzard by Microsoft has been announced, possible exclusivity Call of Duty on Xbox it has become a constant topic of discussion. However, the people of Redmond stated from the outset that they do not intend to change the availability of popular shooter first personwhich is heavily featured on the PlayStation.
According to Phil Spencer, the future of video games is no longer exclusive games.
“I will only say to players who love Activision Blizzard games on the Sony platform: we have no intention of pushing communities away from this platform, and we remain committed to that,” the Xbox boss said in January upon learning of the offer. purchase for $68,700 million.
What Phil Spencer did now was, in essence, to ratify the position that – at least publicly – he has been defending since the beginning of this year. Apart from personal or business beliefs, this is also likely part of Microsoft’s strategy. to obtain regulatory approval close the acquisition of Activision Blizzard.
After all, if the people of Redmond showed a lot of interest in limiting access to some of the world’s most popular games to only Xbox users, the FTC would certainly raise arms.
While it is also a reality that neither Phil Spencer nor Microsoft need to do Call of Duty exclusive game for Xbox. Looking ahead, the real difference will likely be that you’ll be able to include future games in the franchise – and the rest of Activision’s vast intellectual property – from day one on Game Pass.
Source: Hiper Textual
