The court rejected Grande’s arguments that the provider should not be held responsible for its customers’ illegal activities, saying the company “knowingly provided the means for copyright infringement.”
However, the decision to take back $47 million was overturned. The court ruled that the original compensation calculation based on individual songs was incorrect. Instead, damages should be calculated on an album-by-album basis, not on an individual song basis.
A new trial is now needed to determine the amount of compensation.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
