The Overclock3D portal mistakenly published tests of the Core Ultra 285K, 265K and 245K models, but the review was quickly deleted. But the information managed to spread.

In Cinebench R24 tests, the new processors performed slightly better than their predecessors, while their performance was at the same level in Cinebench R23.

that slide
I chose this instead of advertising.

But in games the results were disappointing – the top 24-core Core Ultra 9 285K model performed at the level of the Intel i5-14600K, which clearly did not meet user expectations.

According to experts, the main reason for such poor results is long memory latencies.

Source: Ferra

Previous article“Paleurobots” began to be used to understand how fish started walkingScience and Technology25 October 2024 06:45
Next articleOfficial posters of the yet-to-be-announced flagships Xiaomi 15 and 15 Pro were leaked to the internetPhones25 October 2024, 07:08
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here