The publishers sought damages, arguing that OpenAI’s actions amounted to copyright infringement because ChatGPT created summaries or “duplicate” articles without proper attribution. However, Judge Colleen McMahon ruled that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to sue because they had not proven that the OpenAI training directly harmed them.
Despite this decision, the case was not completed. The publishers plan to seek permission to amend and proceed with the case.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
