Forcing Google to sell Chrome is a ‘terrible idea’, warns its former CEO

USA The goal was to break the monopoly Googleand one of its main measures is to force you to sell Chromium. Residents of Mountain View are outraged because they consider the decision part of a “radical interventionist agenda.” Eric Schmidtthe company’s former CEO called it a “terrible idea.”

In a recent interview with NPRSchmidt made no secret of the fact that he believes that what the US Department of Justice is proposing won’t workand it will harm society. And he argued that consumers want an integrated experience, not fragmentation like the one the authorities are proposing.

“I think this is a terrible idea from the government. Take an integrated system, break it down into parts and think that somehow this will create options [para elegir] does not understand how these products work. Customers want an integrated experience. This is true for Chrome and search advertising engines; The same is true, for example, with Apple and the App Store. […]. “If you want to try to solve the problems of these large companies, my answer is to find ways to make them more competitive,” Eric Schmidt said of the situation Google faces with Chrome.

The former Google CEO also believed that the case against Chrome is based on old model of competition and that, even if the browser were to separate from its current owners, the public would be responsible for reuniting them. But not only that, since this decision would not make sense from an economic point of view.

“Let’s say you have an independent company called Chrome. This Chrome company will be tightly integrated with Google’s advertising system, and that’s one of the things that I think the government is falsely complaining about,” Eric Schmidt said.

The future of Google Chrome will be determined in 2025

While the US Department of Justice has proposed selling Chrome as part of structural and behavioral measures to end Google’s monopoly, the future of the web browser – and the rest of the proposed measures – This will only be determined in 2025.. Residents of Mountain View will face trial in April to try to fend off these attempts.

Google believes that the hypothetical sale of Chrome would ruin the user experience and make it more insecure. Californians have poured billions of dollars into developing and maintaining the app and believe not many companies have the resources to do the same. They even suggest that the potential buyer may not be interested in keeping the code open sourcewhich will impact other Chromium based browsers.

Getting back to Eric Schmidt, his criticism wasn’t limited to what might happen to Chrome in the future. The former Google executive also expressed dissatisfaction with the ban on multimillion-dollar agreements like the one the company signed with Apple to make its search engine the default option on Safari. A businessman involved in conversations with Cupertino called it a “complex and long-negotiated” agreement. And he believed that governments should not interfere in the relationship between the two corporations. without a specific goal. “There’s no point in forcing these artificial structures to search for an undefined target,” he said.

In addition to selling Google Chrome and banning agreements like Apple’s, the US has proposed several other measures against Mountain View. The Justice Department is also investigating. Android salesunless very stringent requirements are met. Added to this is the licensing of Google’s search index and other usage data to its competitors, among other things.