Chatgpt, ‘Artificial Superlikellij’, who speaks badly about the view of the Creator himself criticizes.

Openai CEO Sam Altman has now made a series of predictions, where general artificial intelligence (AGI) was released and can play things, can be used by authoritarian governments and will not be open to everyoneIn addition to other things. Expressions in a text published on Sunday 9.

Thinking about a different analysis of the manager’s statements and warnings, BGR Chatgpt asked the boat to analyze the text of Altman, as he had to be influenced by super -gold progress. AI Generative admitted that the document was approaching a similar technology and that the executive was concerned about some of its lines.

“Although he does not call me directly, he describes the orbit that I integrate into the society more useful, common, and integrated into society.” Technology also emphasized the positive effects of a more advanced, cheap and affordable IA, but did not forget negatives.

. Excessive dependence on smart vehicles and Altman’s minimizing AG Some. Regarding the first, ChatGPT questioned whether it would be used to “increase human intelligence, not to change it”, and the second in the Bot would be used to activate super -individuals or to serve institutional interests.

Extreme optimism

Curiously, OpenAi Manufacturer AI criticized the optimistic tone of the statements of the Start CEOemphasizing that the most powerful version of technology can be revolutionary as long as it complies with some rules. In the Bot’s opinion, the executive revealed some important questions.

“The blog draws a very optimistic appearance of AI’s future, but avoids the risks and difficulties that accompany it. Agr can be revolutionary if the right policies are developed with ethical and accessibility. But if it is managed badly, it can create serious social imbalances, Chat Chatgpt wrote.

As the report states, technology views show that even with controversial questions and all kinds of questions that lead to criticism of their creators. According to the publication, it would put it on the other IAS, who was accused of censorship.