Mincifers said it would be a part of the infrastructure focusing on the state functions of the messenger. This has immediately caused controversy between experts and users – many of them are concerned about privacy problems, access to personal data, and possible restrictions.
The President of the Digital Economy Development Fund Council, German Klimenko, said in an interview with 360.ru, the idea of rejecting anonymity could be requested. In recent years, the growth of fraudulent schemes, people to look for more protected and transparent communication methods, he said. According to him, only a region without anonymity can effectively resist attackers.
At the same time, Alexei Mostovshchikov, General Director of Ano “Digital Development Agency”, doubted the popularity of the new platform. He emphasized that users value privacy and are not ready to share their data with state structures. According to him, the decree on the creation of Messenger will scare a significant part of the audience about its use to confirm personality.
Bridge people also drew attention to security -related risks. In case of hacking, the addition of the account to “public services ve, including passport data and medical records, values large -scale access to personal information in case of hacking.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
