Now that the first reviews and cross-model comparisons of the iPhone 16, both the regular and Pro models, have emerged, the first controversy surrounding its camera has also come to light. The Tony & Chelsea Northrup YouTube channel has released a video that includes: He takes issue with the iPhone 16 Pro’s camera, saying it’s “absolutely wrong” when it comes One of its cameras has a resolution of 48 MP suggests a real resolution of “around six megapixels.” But an authoritative voice contradicts this and suggests that there is another kind of reality. which is worth explaining.

Is the iPhone 16 Pro’s 48MP fake?

In the video you can see here, Northrup calls iPhone 16 Pro camera ‘disappointing and misleading’ It says it ” around 6 real megapixels in ideal conditions.” It also It shows that 2x zoom is wrong and the quality is not the best and “becomes absolutely terrifying.” Finally, he notes that the ultra-wide lens, which has been upgraded to 48MP, has “the same fake 48MP treatment.”

iPhone 16 Pro camera module is very decisive

The incredible thing about this is that These are meaningless statements because the Youtuber doesn’t have an iPhone 16 Pro to prove it.His comments are based on his previous experiences with the iPhone 15 Pro. Dared to compare iPhone camera with SLR camera.

Is iPhone’s 48MP fake as they say? Sebastian de WithCo-founder of Lux and one of the developers behind the Halide app quickly expressed his disagreement Indicating that the iPhone sensor is It has 48 MP but thanks to the color coating technology. Each pixel captures a single color, so “the output of four separate (RGB) pixels is combined into a single pixel.” The “true resolution” is 12MP, but thanks to this Technology called Quad Bayer Gives you a better level of detail than a 12MP lensThe 6 MP claim by the Youtuber is a complete lie.

You can’t compare the camera with the iPhone for a specific detail

According to PetaPixel, who was able to speak with Sebastiaan de With, he states: “It’s not useful to compare the iPhone to a full-frame camera”The truth is that Physics also plays an important role when shooting with either device.

You can’t beat physics when it comes to capturing light and achieving a certain type of representation. Cell phones make up for it in an area where they clearly excel: computing. Computational photography has made possible things that a full-frame camera could never even dream of.

The fairest comparison is between the sensors used in iPhones; 48MP vs. 12MP to be exact.Although With firmly believes in this Megapixels are not relevant enough a “what comes next”reliable quality indicator camera and resolution.

iPhone 16 Pro news summary

In conclusion, He says he’s wrong to say the iPhone’s high resolution is “misleading” or “it’s questionable only on paper.” He closes by noting that all iPhone users use their cameras every day, and that higher resolution and more detail produce good results. They probably don’t have the same capabilities as a full frame camera but this falls into “comparing an ‘Apple’ to an orange or a Sony camera.”

If you are waiting for one of the best reviews about the iPhone 16 Pro camera, let us tell you which one it is

Considering the situation with the above-mentioned YouTuber, we cannot ignore this PetaPixel’s note delves deep into megapixel detailsThe 48 MP of the iPhone 16 Pro and some statements-contradictions between what is real and what can be doubted. Apple is determined to show what its cameras have improved over time, from its presentations to content creators.

The interesting thing will come next week because it turned out Sebastiaan de With to publish iPhone 16 Pro camera reviewFor now, you can read what they had to say about the iPhone 15 Pro Max at the time. We’ve also prepared an in-depth comparison between the iPhone 16 Pro and the iPhone 15 Pro.

You can follow iPadify yourself On Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter (X) or check our Telegram channel to stay updated with the latest tech news.