Cosmological revolution? Physicist says there is no dark matter in the universe; to understand

A study written by physicist Rajendra Gupta, a professor at the University of Ottawa in Canada. Proposes a new cosmological model to explain the universe. Instead of the traditional CDM (Lambda-Cold Dark Matter in Portuguese abbreviation), The model, which is based on “normal matter”, “dark energy” and “dark matter” based on the Big Bang, brings with it the combination of two revolutionary ideas.

The new theory, called CCC+TL, brings together the theories of covariant coupling constants (CCC) and “tired light” (TL) in a “combination”. The model suggests “how the forces of nature diminish over cosmic time and the loss of light’s energy when it travels a long distance.”“says a statement from the author.

The discovery, which passed the first test of how galaxies spread out and how light evolved in the early universe, contradicts the current model, which suggests that dark matter accounts for 27% of the universe’s mass energy; mysterious dark energy, 68%; and only 5% of everything we know, such as stars, planets and gases.

Is there dark matter in the universe?

Even the world’s greatest scientists are aware that dark matter is nothing more than a fantastic story explaining the expansion of the universe.

That magnificent concept It doesn’t interact with electromagnetic radiation, which means it’s something no one has physically seen before.It is detected only by some gravitational effects observed in matter that we can see.

Therefore, presenting evidence of an alternative model for dark matter in the universe opens new doors in understanding the reality we live in.

Is dark matter needed in the universe?

According to Gupta, there is no need for the concept of dark matter to understand the universe. CCC+TL proposes that the accelerating expansion of the universe is simply a result of the weakening of the forces of nature, as cosmic inflation occurs. This also contradicts the prevailing understanding of the existence of dark energy.

In addition to analyzing recent studies of the distribution of galaxies at low redshifts (relatively close and slower), Gupta also evaluated the angular size of so-called “sound horizons,” which are wave-like patterns in the distribution of stars and gas. sound in galaxies.

And his conclusion is: “The findings of the study confirm that our previous work on the age of the Universe as 26.7 billion years allowed us to discover that the universe does not need dark energy to exist.” He argues that the rapid expansion of the universe, caused by so-called dark energy, “is not actually caused by dark energy, but by the weakening of the forces of nature as it expands.”

And now? Is the work of physicist Rajendra Gupta accurate? Let us know what you think of this theory on our social media. See you soon!