Taylor Swift has long been criticized by environmental groups for the huge carbon footprint of private jet travel. It is estimated that he performed covers only at his concerts in 2023 286,000 kilometers, which is 7.2 times more than worldwide and equivalent to 16 full days in the air. But the most worrying figure is the 1,216 tons of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere.
It should be noted that some of these flights were not made by her. Millionaires very often rent out or lend their private jets to each other. After all, these are tons of carbon dioxide released on your behalf.
For this reason, Taylor Swift had to buy at least 2433 carbon credits. These are bonds for which companies, governments and some individuals They literally pay for the pollution. Money from carbon credits is invested in greenhouse gas capture or reforestation efforts in a way that supposedly offsets what they pollute. But is it worth it? Decontamination strategies have their limits. On the other hand, the infection of some personalities does not seem to have this. It’s clear that these people need to move, but wouldn’t they be better off giving up their private jet instead of investing millions of dollars to compensate for the pollution they’re polluting?
Taylor Swift being infected is nothing new.
Already in 2022, a list of the 10 celebrities who pollute the environment the most, especially through their private jets, was published. Taylor Swift led the way with 170 flights since January.
Its average flight time was only 80 minuteshardly On average 225 km per flight. According to this study, total emissions from flights in 2022 were 8,293.54 tons1184.8 times more than the average person’s total annual emissions.
His tour began in March 2023. Eras Tourin which so far he has released 1216 tons aforementioned. The tour is not over yet. He will continue to travel the world until December 2024, when his final concert will take place in Vancouver. Thus, emissions are expected to continue to rise.
Cost of carbon credits
Carbon credits have a variable price that depends on the current pollution situation. In 2023, when The Eras Tour began, it was about 100 euros per loan. Since the loan gives the right to issue ton carbon dioxide or other greenhouse gases, the Eras Tour alone would require more than 1,200 credits or, in other words, 120,000 euros. But in 2022, 8,200 loans would be needed. We know that Taylor Swift purchased 2,433 credits, so she would need a large amount to cover all of her emissions. I may have bought more, but that’s what there is evidence for.
Indeed, one person can buy maximum carbon credits. If it exceeds this figure, it will have to buy them from third parties or produce them through its own decontamination strategies.
So if you try to stop billionaires from over-polluting simply because they can afford it. That’s the problem with these bonds. Silk White card those with money are adding fuel to the fire of global warming. No matter how much they try to compensate, the balance will always shift in the same direction.
What can Taylor Swift do to solve this problem?
According to the list compiled in 2022, this year Taylor Swift’s shortest flight lasted just 36 minutesfrom Missouri to Nashville, where his family lives. Obviously, these distances can be covered by other, less polluting modes of transport.
Even if you need a plane, it is always better to use commercial flights than private jets. This would be difficult for someone with that many followers, which would possibly make it difficult to have calm flight.
So is carbon dioxide the price of fame? When we pay to see our idols, are we literally giving wings to pollution? Have we paid the bonuses that a millionaire pays for his contribution to global warming? There are many questions that we usually don’t think about. Perhaps we cannot directly blame individuals such as Taylor Swift, but rather to that capitalist system in which speed is also rewarded and turns our idols into gods. Regardless, the planet pays for the consequences, and together with it, we all ultimately pay for them.
Source: Hiper Textual
