Lily Phillips shares her full STD test: did she get infected after sleeping with 100 men in one day?

Lily Phillips must have been overwhelmed by all the fuss caused by the documentary in which she challenges sleep with 100 men in one day. Some people criticized what he did out of sheer spite, but other “critics” have nothing but genuine concern. In conversations with his interviewer, he repeatedly demonstrated that he did not fully understand how some sexually transmitted infections were spread. Many people mentioned the danger she was in and she published her full STD test to clear up any doubts.

“Successfully approved,” he says. But can it really be considered “approved”? Can we conclude that the risk has passed and that Lily does not have any sexually transmitted infections? Fortunately, most likely yes.

You could make a mistake by doing just one HIV antibody test. In this case, given that this virus has a fairly long window period before antibodies begin to be produced, false negative result. However, PCR is also carried out, in which viral particles are detected in the early stages. This time, it looks like Lily Phillips was lucky. However, if you take the same measures to your new challenge as you did to the previous one, you will again find yourself in danger.

What does the Lily Phillips STD test contain?

In the Lily Phillips STD test, we can see the results of various tests with five types of samples: blood, urine and cells from the vagina, throat and rectum.

The risky encounter, in which she slept with 100 men in one day, occurred in mid-October. Lily Phillips took samples on December 9th. Therefore, an HIV antibody test will not be enough. On the other hand, PCR, which detects the presence of viral particles in mucous membranes, may be effective much earlier. Would it be interesting to repeat the tests later? The truth is that yes, but overall it seems that it can be considered free from syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, HIV, hepatitis B, hepatitis C and Mycoplasma genitalium.

Of the most common sexually transmitted infections, only one is missing. human papillomavirus (HPV). However, given that she is 23 years old, it is possible that she was vaccinated as a child or had it done as an adult, given her profession.

From another virus for which there is a vaccine, the hepatitis BIt seems that she has not been vaccinated, since there are no antibodies in her blood. But, fortunately, the result was negative, so there are no problems. If you have not been tested for HPV, it may be because you have been vaccinated and are not at risk of infection.

The danger is not over yet

Lily Phillips is very lucky, judging by her STD test. However, in February he wants to repeat the challenge, this time with 1000 people. The risk would be much higher, especially if he continued without taking the precautions that were lacking in his previous feat. You should make sure that the men you sleep with have not had sex again since the STD test. And don’t allow recruited men to be replaced at the last minute because they won’t have time to get tested. And of course, don’t let them ejaculate in your mouth. This way, if a positive person avoids tests, they will not be at risk of becoming infected. Of course, provided you always use a condom.

There are many measures that Lily Phillips must take. in February. This test, which has just been made public, is good news, but it should not be trusted based on its results. With each new contact, a risk arises again if no action is taken.