Top Shooter: Maverick it is a worldwide phenomenon, and rightly so. The movie, starring Tom Cruise, has done nothing but praise and has been breaking box office records since its release; but it also helped re-energize the original film released in 1986. the best weapon it has never lost its relevance, maintaining its status as a classic action movie despite the passing decades, the appearance of a new production by Joseph Kosinski has allowed it to be seen with different eyes.
In addition to the merits of one and the other, both films sparked heated debate about realistic interpretation of the action. But we must not forget that these are works of art, not documentaries; so it makes sense that there are certain creative licenses in certain aspects of the story or in the depiction of action scenes.
Without going into details, we note one of the most iconic and famous scenes the best weapon could never be done in real life. Not only for technical and security reasons, but also because it would violate United States military law and may be sentenced to death. What are we talking about? From a “close encounter” between a Maverick, Goose and a fictional MiG-28 with an F-14 Tomcat in inverted flight.
Yes the best weapon happened in real life, Maverick’s prospects would not be good
The upside down cat scene remains one of the most memorable in the best weapon but, as we said, an identical situation in a real setting would entail very serious consequences for its actors. And if you’re wondering why, the answer is simple: why? “knowingly and unlawfully” endangering a military aircraft.
Here is how Title 10 of the United States Code explains it in section 910, section 110, subsection (a):
Any person subject to this chapter who knowingly and unlawfully endangers or permits endangerment of any ship or aircraft of the armed forces shall be liable to death or such other punishment as may be imposed by a military tribunal.
And it doesn’t take much to prove that it was a deliberate act. Let’s not forget that the situation happens in the first minutes the best weapon, after several threats between the main characters that end without opening fire. “I can’t film this bastard. Let’s see if we can have some fun with him,” Maverick says, before tackling Gus as the posh photographer.
It is clear that the death penalty is the most extreme remedy that can be considered in the face of such a possibility; however, its use would be feasible in time of war. Therefore, if a clash between Maverick and his opponent triggered a military conflict, this would be one option to consider.
And back to the same: we judge fiction by the standard of reality. Without a doubt, this is an absurd game; but that’s part of what pops up in discussions about what’s realistic and what’s not in films like the best weapon D Top Shooter: Maverick. As we said at the beginning, these are works of fiction, not documentaries, and you should take them as such and enjoy them accordingly.
But if you’re interested in the legal implications of Maverick’s behavior in real life, there’s plenty to explore. Recent video about LegalEagle on YouTube reveals all the situations that, if given in the real world, would be worth several reprimands to the character of Tom Cruise.
In that case, it must be assumed that a rebel like Pete Mitchell would never have become a member of the Top Gun program at Naval Air Station Miramar, California. But what would our lives be like without Maverick and Goose soaring through the sky in their F-14s?
Source: Hiper Textual
