Currently, and less than you live under a stone, you know it. Emilia Perez This has become a continuous source of contradictions, scandal and uncomfortable situations in the award season. From the statements of the director Jacquard, who belongs to the Spanish, to the series of actress Carla Sofia Gascon against minorities and vulnerable communities. The truth is that nothing was enough in what seems to be a quick escalation of antipathy and disputes. The one that even seems doubts The same message of the film about tolerance, diversity and criticism of inequality.
Therefore, it confuses that, despite all of the above, the tape can boast of several consistent achievements. On the one hand, before the scandal became viral, his triumph in the Cannes of 2024, in which he received recognition for his director and actors. Then four gold globes that recognized the condition of the phenomenon tape. But these were 13 nominations that he received between the categories of the Oscar of the Academy, which became a historical milestone. So at present, His success in the seasons of awards, competes with a scandal around him.
However, this is not the first time that a similar phenomenon takes place with Emilia Perev. We leave you five times when the film caused disputes, discomfort and even antipathy, and yet it was awarded. From the literary classics, which has become a romantic epic without further depth, to the film that his same director should not win an Oscar. A collection for shame of great seasons of awards.
An awkward vision of “memories of Africa”
Long before Emilia Perez, in 1985, the adaptation of the book Karen Blixen quickly became one of the favorites of the night of the Oscar of the Academy. The reasons did not disappear. The film was shot by the famous Sidney Pollak, and Meryl Streep and Robert Redford were in his actor. But, in addition, it was a timeless story about love, desire and, in the end, about an unsatisfied need. Everything is in the middle Great and unusual landscapes of wild and magnificent Africa.
But the film caused negative criticism, and in fact he reaped Antipachi among experts in African culture and even Nairobi residents, the country in which it was shot. Several media called a racist film, and in fact they insisted that he portrayed the population of the continent as a mockery. This is because most black characters were servants or simply formed Part of the conspiracy to increase the level of its white main characters.
Even more complicated, the image that he provided from the continent. There was criticism of historians from -with freedoms to represent the culture of South Africa. In particular, from Nairobi, which eventually became a set of stereotypes around the love story in the exotic territory. Much more when the condescending scenario was accused of depicting colonialism as part of a wild scenario. Despite this, the tape won Oscar for the best film in 1986.
Racism in “Walking to Miss Daisy”
One of the most embarrassing moments of the 1980s has as a center of polemic about the implicit racism of the Academy. And, therefore, Oscar award as a symbol of the world of entertainment. This was processed to everything that was surrounded Walk to Miss Daisy Bruce Beresord, Melodramatic and ordinary tape, which trivialized racism. In the line with the contradiction of Emilia Perez.
This, transforming the friendship of the white old woman (Jessica Tandy, who won the best actress for this film) and her black driver (Morgan Freeman) in allegory about discrimination. That, without taking into account the racial policy that could surround Both the characters and the historical moment in which both lived in the plot.
A story that develops from 1948 to 1973 in the midst of a tough social climate, trivializes the context for the benefit of central drama. Which led to discussions, protests and debate against the tape. Much more when it became clear that he would collide Born July 4 Oliver Stone, firm pacifist and social justice. But, finally, the Academy and its members decided to reward the most traditional ones – and Without a doubt, more harmless is the Berester’s film.
The defeat of “Shakespeare in love”
The triumph of this film John Madden ended Save the soldier Ryanbecame part of the history of the Hollywood shame. Especially because this made it clear that the force of the intimidation campaign, now undertaken by Harvey Weinstein, fallen in shame. The situation related to the dirty war against Spielberg and his team, to the extensive marketing campaign. The latter, with the agenda of the day of the interview that prevented them Opponents at one end, who soon only spoke about Madden’s film.
On the other extreme were parties, gifts, gifts and all kinds of shakes for voters. Weinstein also insisted on various media and publications to launch a series of rumors about historical mistakes in Spielberg’s work. In addition to the fact that the best from the tape was unlikely to occur in the first 15 minutes, which caused empty rooms and malicious criticism. Everything, while the monumental press campaign sold Shakespeare in love as a job for a cult and the choice of an audience. Against From the military epic of Spielberg, which was perceived as a boring tape without incentives.
Finally, after almost a year to be a favorite, Save the soldier Ryan He saw his chances to get a figurine for the best film until it disappears. So the triumph Shakespeare in love In 1999, as the best film, he had a bitter taste. He left not only epic, but also ethics in advertising campaigns. The turn of the circumstances that will celebrate the academy.
“Crash” (collision), a film that no one wanted
2005 was of particular importance for the cinema, which was deepened in diversity, tolerance and love. Gorbai mountain From Eng Lee became a rarity that surprised criticism and fascinated the audience. The story of the two jeans, which ultimately fall in love and live under the weight of discrimination, came out of the need. But, in addition, the director managed to provide the tape of tragic and timeless air, Which has become part of the history of the cinema. Which would cost 8 nominations for an Oscar.
At the other end, Claim (collision) From Paul Haggis, he investigated racism from a stereotypical point of view and with obvious scenarios. But she was definitely a much more traditional candidate to succeed on awards night. Despite the accusations of your argument of the manipulator and your point of view An artificial view of an uncomfortable topic, the film received six nominations.
As the nights of the awards approached, it became obvious that the situation for veiled land became more and more complicated. This is when members of the Academy, such as Ernest Borginn and Tony Curtis, expressed their audience, their discomfort from the film. A situation that has become more complicated, thanks to a series of publications on The image is supposedly distorted on a traditional cowboy proposed by a ribbon.
Despite the foregoing, no one expected that Claim (collision)Completely defeat the film Anga Li. It was exactly what happened when the film received three Oscar awards, including the best film. The decision that even Paul Haggis himself criticized, opinion that his film did not deserve recognition. For the history of scandals.
“Green Book” and his awkward drama
The film by Peter Falley caused criticism as soon as the 2019 award season began. Only in reality, the tape took the figure of a famous musician to explore in a contradictory formula: such a named magic black. This is none other than the plot that uses the life of a black character to confirm the redemption of white. A resource that a tape that spoke about a unlikely friendship between Shirley and his driver Frank Tony Lip Valelong were used without special dissimation.
Even more complicated, it was a study of discrimination, turned into an insignificant and exotic scenario to transform his characters. Experts in racial policy insisted that the film lacked strength, research and this trivial very serious situations that Don Shirley had to cross. Everything became worse, during the press in which none of the members of the production team or its main characters knew how to answer questions about a complex context. Mahershal Ali, who would ultimately win Oscar for her Don Interpretation, evaded without much hiding the most fundamental issues.
On the other hand, Wiggo Mortensen (Vallelonga in fiction) was expressed in offensive terms against the black community. What caused the excitement, and then public apologies. To end in the tense forecasts of the press in which questions were prohibited. This is before reaching the cancellation, when the end of the award season approached. With everything and, despite the scandal, The film rose with a statuette for the best film of the year of 2019.
Source: Hiper Textual
