During the day, Xiaomi offers several modes to choose from, including more natural colors. Additionally, the 14 Ultra cannot take high-quality macro photos with the main camera, which is disappointing.
The main disadvantage of Xiaomi is the instability of picture quality. Vivo X200 Pro does this much better. However, Vivo’s main sensor size is smaller.
The ultra-wide view of Xiaomi 14 Ultra is good only because it has a wider viewing angle. In terms of dynamic range, Vivo X200 Pro wins.
At 2x zoom the 14 Ultra produces more detail than the X200 Pro, but at 3.7x (Vivo) or 3x (Xiaomi) the Vivo is better.
You can see some examples of photos below.
I chose this instead of advertising.
I chose this instead of advertising.
If you take photos in automatic mode during the day or at night, then there will be no difference for you between Xiaomi 14 Ultra and Vivo X200 Pro. However, during the day, at 2x zoom and 50MP mode, the 14 Ultra was superior in terms of detail. In general, Xiaomi produces less stable images in terms of quality compared to Vivo.
Source: Ferra
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
