The manufacturer of chemicals for the “ear nanny” won the Wildberries court due to the sale of falsifications

According to the materials in the case, at the end of 2023, Nevskaya Cosmetics found a falsified product under the WB under the brand of the nanny with ear. It was offered by several individual businessmen from Mordovia, Dagestan and Kazakhstan. Most of the falsification was sold in the form of gels to wash with a capacity of 5 liters, however, the plaintiff does not produce goods in bottles of this volume.

It was not possible to resolve the conflict in pretrial order, and the Neva Cosmetics went to court. As a result, the WB eliminated falsification to the Court’s decision, but it did more than eight months after receiving claims from the plaintiff. As a result, the Court satisfied its claims only partially, forcing the market to pay 2 million compensation rubles.

In turn, WB appealed to the decision of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow region in the tenth Court of Arbitration. The meeting in this case is scheduled for February 26, said arbitration affairs files.

The WB RB.RU press service said that the demand was supposed to be presented to the sellers of goods, and not to the market, which acts as an information mediator. In addition, the plaintiff was forced to present the calculation of the declared compensation and justify its size, which did not, added to the company.

In addition, the court “did not take into account all the circumstances of the case and did not give the reasons why he raised compensation in this amount,” said the Marketplais press service. They added that to minimize such cases, WB in September 2022 launched the digital arbitration service, which allows copyright holders to directly contact the sellers and verify the documents of the goods.

RB.RU sent a request to Neva Cosmetics.

Previously, the Federal Anti -Ponopoolio service said that it demanded that WB and Ozon develop a transparent discount mechanism until February 28, which will act only with the consent of the vendors. “In the case of lack of compliance with warnings within the prescribed period, the service will initiate cases of violation of antimonopoly legislation,” said the regulator.