Vivo X200 Ultra in Vivo front camera can be removed in 23 mm mode without cropping and only 35 mm is available in the main one. The dynamic range is of course better in the iPhone 16 Pro while shooting on a selfie camera. His field of view is also wider.
While shooting at 4K 60 f/s on the main camera, the iPhone appears in the clothes of the clothes when we don’t remove the sky. As soon as it brings it to heaven, the lights disappear. This is strange.
Super -haired Vivo already has a frame from the iPhone. Because at least 16 Pro is better than stabilization. With color creation, all plus minus is the same.
When shooting 23 mm on the main camera, the quality is a little better on the iPhone. However, the picture with 1.5x is cleaner on vivo.
In the case of weak lighting in 4K 60 f/s, the iPhone is significant artifacts during movement (turns into “turf” oats “). In Vivo, the picture does not change when you go.
The iPhone 16 Pro has noise, if you approach weak lighting, it will definitely be more. At the same time, Selfie Camer still works in the evening and better for the iPhone at night.
More details can watch everything in the video below.
The Vivo X200 ultra directly offers a logarithm with appropriate settings for users. Everyone can understand it when shooting a video. At the same time, in some cases (in the main, ultra -hot in terms of lens or TV in dark conditions), Vivo will also give a better picture.
It is more difficult to paint in the iPhone video taken in manual mode. Even in the afternoon, there is noise in the shadows. If the camera is important to you, it is better to get vivo.
Source: Ferra

I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.