An international study of the composition of infant formulas has revealed an unpleasant fact – their declared health benefits for babies have not been confirmed in any way. And it’s not that manufacturers are cunning for advertising purposes – everything is much worse. The scientists have collected poor evidence that every branch of baby food needs to be r r r
As early as 1981, WHO introduced the Code of Sellers of Breast-milk Substitutes. This was done in order to curb the aggressive promotion of substitutes and the promotion of non-breastfeeding. But the Code is only advisory in nature, and although modern science recognizes the allocation of milk as optimal nutrition for infants, infant formula manufacturers, this is not the goal.
The large-scale study examined 757 types of infant formula from existing countries as developing countries. Almost all labels contain one or two measurements about the benefits of the formula for the development of the child, but only 74% of them were found in scientific evidence. The emergence of more sexual links is due to animal research, clinical interpretation, and 88% of the research was funded by the manufacturers themselves.
The conclusion is disappointing: a conclusion about behavior that is not capable of self-organization, focused on profit, does not improve the health of children, for which they are ready to manipulate the effectiveness of assistance. State Darcity of people.
Source: Tech Cult
I am a professional journalist and content creator with extensive experience writing for news websites. I currently work as an author at Gadget Onus, where I specialize in covering hot news topics. My written pieces have been published on some of the biggest media outlets around the world, including The Guardian and BBC News.
