We compare two mid-range models that are sure to end the year as bestsellers in 2024: the Galaxy A35 and Redmi Note 13 Pro. Is this the fairest comparison of Xiaomi’s great mobile phone, or should we compare it head-to-head? Galaxy A55? Of course, there is a price difference in favor of a Samsung cell phone, so here we will tell you which one we think offers the best value for money.

Galaxy A35 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro: Features and Specifications

Galaxy A35 Redmi Note 13 Pro
Screen Super AMOLED 6.6″ FHD+ (1080 x 2340p, 390 ppi), 120 Hz

Maximum brightness 1000 nits

Gorilla Glass Victus+

AMOLED 6.67 inches FHD+ (1080 x 2400 pixels, 446 ppi), 120 Hz

Maximum brightness 1800 nits

Gorilla Glass 5

Cameras 50 MP f/1.8 main

8 MP f/2.2 wide angle

5 MP f/2.4 macro

13MP f/2.2 selfie camera

Main 200 MP, f/1.7

8 MP, wide-angle, f/2.2

Macro 2 MP, f/2.4

Selfie 16 MP, f/2.4

CPU Exynos 1380 (5 nm) Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm)
RAM and storage 6 GB/128 GB, 8 GB/128 GB, 8 GB/256 GB, 12 GB/256 GB 8 GB/256 GB, 12 GB/256 GB
Battery 5000 mAh, fast charging 25 W. 5100 mAh, fast charging 67 W.
Dimensions 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm, 7.37 oz (209 g) 161.1 x 74.95 x 7.98 mm, 6.60 oz (188 g)
OS Android 14 with One UI 6.1 Android 13, MIUI 14.
Connectivity Bluetooth 5.3, NFC Bluetooth 5.2, NFC
Networks 2G – 3G – 4G – 5G 2G – 3G – 4G
Price 5097 pesos on Amazon

$5999 at Samsung

5599 pesos on Amazon

6699 pesos at Xiaomi

Galaxy A35 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro: display and design

Digital Trends

As for the screen, there is a slight difference in favor of the Redmi Note 13 Pro, which has a slightly higher resolution panel.

However, in the maximum brightness section, you will notice a significant difference in favor of the Redmi Note 13 Pro, which reaches 1800 nits to the 1000 nits of the Galaxy A35.

When it comes to the protection level of each device’s panel, the Galaxy A35 appears to be a more durable model thanks to the use of Gorilla Glass Victus.

In terms of design, we think the Redmi Note 13 Pro looks more attractive thanks to the use of bezels that look less prominent than the Galaxy A35. However, we think the Galaxy A35 looks a little more premium because it feels like it has an aluminum frame, but this material is only present in its bigger brother, the Galaxy A55.

Galaxy A35 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro: who has the better camera?

Photo of Galaxy A35.
Digital Trends

When it comes to cameras, both phones have the same lens configuration, although there are important differences in sensor size.

In this sense, we notice that the 200MP main sensor of the Redmi Note 13 Pro achieves better results than the Galaxy A35, with photos with a little more detail.

At wide angle, on the other hand, we like the Galaxy A35’s results better, with photos with a higher level of detail and more accurate colors.

For the macro lens, which we’ve always said we’d notice limited functionality unless you’re into insect or flower photography, we see better results on the Galaxy A35.

What we think is important is that in terms of selfies, we see better results with the Galaxy A35. The same thing happens with the video section, which we can see is better achieved on the Samsung phone, both when shooting with the rear or front camera.

To sum it up, we believe that both cell phones achieve similar results in terms of photography, although in video we see the Galaxy A35 superior.

Galaxy A35 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro: performance and autonomy

When it comes to the performance of each mobile phone, we really didn’t find any significant differences between one and the other. One thing to keep in mind is that these are mid-range devices, so if you want to play video games like Call of Duty: Warzoneyou can do this with an average graphics configuration, and both chipsets score almost identically in Antutu benchmarks.

However, you will notice a difference in the charging speed of each device, with the Redmi Note 13 Pro being significantly faster. The battery life of both devices is very similar, but there is a difference in charging speed.

Also remember that the Galaxy A35 does not come with a charger, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro does.

Galaxy A35 vs Redmi Note 13 Pro: which is better?

We believe that, except for the fast charging speed, the Samsung Galaxy A35 offers very similar value for money compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro. However, we cannot lose sight of the fact that the Galaxy A35 will have to be purchased. charger compatible with 25W fast charging.

Considering these aspects, we believe that the preference should be determined by two reasons: the difference between 20 and 30 dollars between each other and the purchase of a charger if you choose Samsung (between 10 and 15 dollars). Apart from this, we believe that these are very similar phones where the purchasing decision could also be based on brand preference.

Source: Digital Trends

Previous articleApiphobia: a fear that Pepe Reina developed due to a terrible accident when he was a child
Next articleWhat happens if bees disappear?

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here